Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
055291
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
053996
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Lancer's Books, 2002.
|
Description |
202p.
|
Standard Number |
8170950937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
046531 | 358.4009546/TIW 046531 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
076974
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
022127
|
|
|
Publication |
July 2002.
|
Description |
59-76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
030140
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
|
Description |
xii, 276p.
|
Standard Number |
0710003188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
018815 | 327.7301724/GIR 018815 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
059129
|
|
|
Publication |
2004.
|
Description |
p7-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
078507
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
062598
|
|
|
Publication |
Mar-Apr 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
154424
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
053081
|
|
|
Publication |
May-June 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
021098
|
|
|
Publication |
Feb 2002.
|
Description |
10-13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
130079
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Artillery modernisation in India implies the largest modernisation of this arm and needs to be given as much, it not more, importance commensurate with the man oeuvre arms it supports. The relevance is more in the Indian context because of the mountainous terrain where it needs to support infantry operations plus in counter insurgency and counter terrorist operations. Unquestionably, artillery units will continue to be used to support the infantry to the benefit at all. It is precisely in these sorts of operation that the new precision of artillery will become more telling and relevant. India has a long way to go in modernising its artillery. Presently, the artillery modernisation plan appears to be stymied. There is an urgent need to provide it an impetus considering the enhanced threat posed to us along a two and a halt front.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
080775
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the origins and development of the sanctuary practice in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The customs and laws relating to the sanctuary practice underwent a process of institutionalization that exemplified a constant tension between religious authorities, who wished to expand the practice, and secular authorities, who wished to eliminate it. This struggle resulted in an accommodation: the adoption of rules that restrict the practice in space, scope and duration. Contemporary leaders can draw on these rules to confront the challenges posed by insurgents who appeal for the right of sanctuary. Specifically, secular leaders can rely on these rules to reduce the insurgents' freedom of movement, to demand the expulsion of insurgents from sacred sites, and to attempt the peaceful resolution of standoffs with insurgents who seek prolonged refuge in sacred sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
105148
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The current scrutiny of British conduct in Afghanistan and Iraq in the wake of allegations of abuse of civilians has raised some troubling questions. But as a review of British history shows, from Northern Ireland to Kenya, atrocities and excesses are by no means a phenomenon unique to 'modern' small wars or today's generation of soldiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
077137
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Afghanistan's fifth effort to form a central army started in 2002, following the fall of the Taleban regime. Mainly run by the US armed forces, the formation of the so-called 'Afghan National Army' run into several difficulties, ranging from initially slow recruitment, low educational level of troops and officers, high attrition rates. As the new army began to take shape, it lacked many of the characteristics which had been associated by the promoters with a 'national' army. It also showed a low level of commitment and a lax discipline. As of 2006, it looked more like an auxiliary force at the service of the US army and its allies than like a 'national' army.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
124684
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
When chief of army staff (COAS), General Bikram Singh took over as the head of the 13 lakh strong army on 31 May 2012, he was conscious of the extraordinary circumstances that had preceded his elevation. His predecessor, in his public fight with the government over his age row, had wittingly or unwittingly harmed the army grievously. The manpower, which is the real asset of any professional army, had been compelled to take sides: for or against the army chief, General V.K. Singh. Was their chief working for the army or simply for himself, was the question being discussed, in hushed voices, at all levels, from senior officers' enclaves, to formation and unit messes, junior commissioned officers (JCO) messes, and soldiers' langars. When the senior-most officer becomes suspect, the other officers could no longer remain above board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
053072
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
064564
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
080866
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The United States and Al Qaeda represent two fundamentally different forms of warfare. The US, with its basis in the Western way of warfare, relies on an almost totally instrumental form of warfare and Al Qaeda, with its basis in the Islamic way of warfare, fights an expressive, existential form of warfare. This paper illustrates how both sides' ways of warfare are converging toward each other. It also argues that this is in fact a good thing because it will allow the US to understand its enemy and thereby allow the US to defeat him in terms he can understand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
065016
|
|
|
Publication |
May-Jun 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|