| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
002892
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
2nd ed
|
| Publication |
Philladelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.
|
| Description |
ix, 308p.
|
| Contents |
Edited for the procedural aspects of International Law Institute in collaboration with Human Rights Group
|
| Standard Number |
0812214102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034380 | 341.481/HAN 034380 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
025214
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.
|
| Description |
xiv, 246p.
|
| Standard Number |
0812281284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 031493 | 341.481/KAT 031493 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
075714
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
While 'peace' and 'justice' advocates share ultimate goals, the short-term concerns and strategies of practitioners in the two fields may differ dramatically. The potential contradictions of pursuing peace and justice are a particular challenge in the context of large-scale conflict, whether internal or international. Both mediators and human rights advocates could use more humility and less arrogance, since neither group can create world (or even local) peace on their own. This article argues that the two disciplines need to build on their shared values of impartiality and independence, while maintaining the distinctive features of each approach, including their concern with ensuring that the less powerful are adequately protected and represented. Neither group should be tolerant of injustice. It concludes that collaboration, or at least mutual appreciation, is certainly feasible, particularly as greater emp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|