Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:861Hits:20059426Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
AFRICA SECURITY (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   053904


Africa's new strategic significance / Mills, Greg Autumn 2004  Journal Article
Mills, Greg Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication Autumn 2004.
        Export Export
2
ID:   101110


China's engagement in African security cooperation: evolution and prospects / Weizhong, Xu   Journal Article
Weizhong, Xu Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
        Export Export
3
ID:   161259


China's involvement in Africa's security: the case of China's participation in the UN mission to stabilize mali / Cabestan, Jean-Pierre   Journal Article
Cabestan, Jean-Pierre Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract China has been much more involved in Africa's economy and trade than in its security. However, over the past decade or so, China has increased its participation in the United Nation's Peacekeeping Operations (UN PKOs), particularly in Africa. It has also taken steps to better protect its overseas nationals and, in 2017, established a naval base in Djibouti. This article focuses on the participation of China's People's Liberation Army in the United Nation's Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) since 2013. It aims to unpack the diplomatic process that led China to take part in this mission and to analyse the form of this participation. Mali was the second time (the first being in South Sudan in 2012) that China opted to deploy combat troops under the UN banner, underscoring a deepening involvement in PKOs and an increasing readiness to face risks. Finally, this article explores the implications of China's participation in the MINUSMA for its foreign and security posture as a whole. Often perceived as a realist rising power, by more actively participating in UN PKOs China is trying to demonstrate that it is a responsible and “integrationist” great power, ready to play the game according to the commonly approved international norms. Is this really the case?
        Export Export