| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
013543
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 1998.
|
| Description |
40-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
122609
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
016294
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
June 1993.
|
| Description |
7-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
005265
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Fairbairn, Air Power Studies Centre, 1994.
|
| Description |
23p.
|
| Series |
Air Power Studies Centre; 20
|
| Standard Number |
0642199183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036476 | 358.17/MAC 036476 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
070619
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
132813
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India's national security, especially its defence preparedness against Pakistan and China, with whom it has disputed border, is passing through a disturbing phase. Pakistan continues with cross border terrorism into Jammu and Kashmir, while China infringes upon Indian land and air space from Ladakh to Arunachal Pradesh at will. Both have made a mockery of the military-held lines with India.
Speaking in Parliament during the recent budget session, defence minister Arun Jaitley expressed satisfaction regarding the two disputed borders. According to him, the Indian Army has minimised infiltration across the Line of Control and terrorism in the hinterland with a mix of good anti-infiltration deployment, monitoring and surveillance means, and the fence. Chinese intrusions, he said, are because of differing perception of the disputed border by the two countries.
Do we want better detection and elimination of terrorists in Kashmir, or do we want to compel Pakistan to stop infiltration? If India does not intrude into Chinese land, why should China do this to India regularly?
India seems to have accepted low defence thresholds against both neighbours. This is worrisome. If Pakistan and China are not deterred by India and its military power, especially boots on the ground, will India's two-front war strategy work to compel them? Why is India spending nearly USD 49 billion annually, which excludes defence pensions and nuclear weapons capability, on defence when it appears blunted? Is there a way out for India without going to war with either or both?
India needs a transformation of its national security and defence thinking. It must know that China rather than Pakistan is its irreconcilable adversary, and the disputed border with China is India's singular core concern which impedes India's rise. Once this is grasped, a new approach to policy-making and warfare would emerge. China could be balanced by a political-military methodology, while peace could be made with Pakistan. India's warfare practised so far would alter drastically. With China as the main adversary, India would no longer be preparing to fight the last war better. With more domains like space, cyber, ballistic and cruise missiles, irregular warriors (terrorists) and nuclear weapons added to the conventional combat on land, air and sea, India will need different higher defence organisation and higher strategic organisation from those proposed so far. All this can be done without raising either annual defence allocations or ringing alarm bells in the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
110179
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
070953
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Santa Monica, Rand Corporation, 1989.
|
| Description |
ix, 46p.
|
| Standard Number |
0833010034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034779 | 327.174/LEM 034779 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
009463
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July-Sept 1995.
|
| Description |
255-275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
062615
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jul-Aug 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
148741
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
010499
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May 1, 1996.
|
| Description |
19-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
087977
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington, US Government, 1984.
|
| Description |
116p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024378 | 341.734/CHA 024378 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
142460
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
012114
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Feb 1997.
|
| Description |
87-90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
028730
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Brassey's Defence Publishers, 1985.
|
| Description |
xxii, 163p.
|
| Standard Number |
0080312012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 026114 | 355.031091821/CAR 026114 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
126378
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Two news items regarding the DRDO long-range cruise missile mission need to be flagged. First, in a rare admission by a DRDO chief, M. Natarajan, days before his retirement on 1 September 2009, said that, "The lack of success in developing indigenous propulsion systems for the country's major programmes is a cause of concern. Affected are programmes such as the aero engines for fighter aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles, engines for tanks and naval propulsion and ramjet and hypersonic propulsion for missiles."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
064907
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
088497
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Demver, University of Denver, 1985.
|
| Description |
v.21; ix, 116p.
|
| Standard Number |
087940079X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 026176 | 335.033/COF 026176 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
053845
|
|
|