| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
054086
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
091641
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Pluto Press, 2009.
|
| Description |
xv, 192p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780745328553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054479 | 951/KEI 054479 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
005103
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Houndmills, macmillan Press, 1994.
|
| Description |
x,290p.
|
| Standard Number |
0333586735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036175 | 340.110951/KEI 036175 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
030257
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Croom Helm, 1986.
|
| Description |
303p
|
| Standard Number |
0709915721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 027541 | 333.790951/KEI 027541 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
045053
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Croom Helm, 1986.
|
| Description |
303p.
|
| Standard Number |
0709915721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 028018 | 333.790951/KEI 028018 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
090115
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The analysis of the profile and role of China's Supreme People's Court needs updating. The Court is actively developing new interpretative formats that concern its relations with sister organizations and the National People's Congress. This article contextualizes these formats within China's changing institutional dynamics. China does not have a separation of powers; however, the Chinese system of justice does have its own separation of functions. The Court is playing a pivotal role from within the changing separation of functions, but the extent and quality of its independence from other organizations are open to question. In the context of deepening legal reform, the law is still incomplete and imperfect, and Court interpretation has often served as "secondary law." In short, pragmatic judicial interpretations have sometimes preceded legislation by Congress. Remedy such as secondary law might be justified as absolute administrative necessity given the outstanding structural problems that characterize China's criminal justice system, but it has attracted internal criticism that argues for narrowing the function of the Court to a more tightly disciplined judicial role as well as for plugging the holes in legal process and structure by creating guiding case law and supporting the "freedom of judge's decision making."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
112379
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article focuses on the understudied area of Internet-facilitated judicial transparency and its implications for the right to know, the citizen's engagement with China's court system, and the related development of competent legal reasoning. The analytical focus is on recent China Supreme People's Court regulations bolstering open reporting on court websites. This article explores the scope and quality of this reform, comparing it with earlier 'open trial' initiatives and investigating its origins and its contemporary implications, both in terms of generating public confidence in fair trial and furthering the development of legal education inside and outside of the legal system. The Internet may help to circulate an improved legal reasoning within the judiciary as well as support a more informed public understanding of the law's requirements. Openness may pressure judges into a wider process of research and learning as they are more exposed to public scrutiny. At the same time it may well expose the extant level of legal incompetence in China's new legal system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|