| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
105527
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
156891
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
054178
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jul-Sep 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
103577
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
068351
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
164390
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
110332
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
061460
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Mar 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
079034
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
088620
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
133889
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In early 2013, political environment of Bangladesh more or less was against ruling AL Alliance. Public support was tilting towards Opposition. BNP exploited this situation and won five Corporation elections. In this situation, they went to hard bargaining for Care Taker Government (CTG). In fact, Bangladesh politics during the year of 2013 was largely guided by the difference between two main political parties BNP and AL. Ruling AL remained fixed to hold Jatiya Sansad Election under all party government headed by Prime Minister and BNP strongly wanted to hold election under non-party caretaker government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
133895
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In early 2013, political environment of Bangladesh more or less was against ruling AL Alliance. Public support was tilting towards Opposition. BNP exploited this situation and won five Corporation elections. In this situation, they went to hard bargaining for Care Taker Government (CTG). In fact, Bangladesh politics during the year of 2013 was largely guided by the difference between two main political parties BNP and AL. Ruling AL remained fixed to hold Jatiya Sansad Election under all party government headed by Prime Minister and BNP strongly wanted to hold election under non-party caretaker government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
093360
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
157029
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
113606
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
139867
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The people of India and Bangladesh have been witnessing many ups and down in bilateral relations between these two neighbouring countries of South Asia during the last four decades. Foreign policies of newly independent countries have often changed with the regime change—as in the case of Bangladesh. Therefore, no consistent policies were pursued towards India during this period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
148870
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Hindus who were uprooted from their hearths and homes in East
Pakistan due to religious persecution and measures or lack of them,
taken by the successive Governments in East Pakistan (Bangladesh)
after partition in 1947 were accepted as refugees by the Government of
India and her people, not of course without grudge, and were given
shelter, citizenship and were gradually absorbed in the mainstream of
Indian people, particularly that of West Bengal, Assam and Tripura.
This was quite understandable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
082581
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
135442
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
SAARC countries face challenges on internal as well as external fronts. Terrorism has posed a big threat to mutual understanding and cooperation in the region in recent years. Some of the neighbouring countries of India are suspected to have given it state patronage, which has to be stopped if SAARC has to grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
148906
|
|
|