|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
101696
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Most theories that seek to explain the relationship between major war and the creation of new political orders posit a direct link between the interests of the winning states and the type of order that emerges. We tend to assume that since most wars are fought for specific purposes and a defined goal, the aftermath of the conflict will reflect the interests and preferences of the winning parties. This article challenges this approach, arguing that the necessity of securing public support and winning allies forces states to make public commitments for a postwar reconstruction that they might otherwise avoid. During the course of the war, states unintentionally limit their options for the postwar reconstruction by publicly articulating a set of 'war aims' that are designed to rally public support and win over potential allies. Since war aims are as much statements of propaganda as of policy they often do not reflect the state interest per se. However, once articulated, they become the official policy of the coalition, and political leaders are forced to implement their principles as the foundation for the new order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
104323
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
THE MIDDLE East roils and one fact is certain: interventions end badly. For intervention leads to postwar reconstruction and postwar reconstruction leads to failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
132045
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
During the early part of the 21st century, Chinese academic circles made judgments and forecasts about US. war aims in Afghanistan and the Middle East, the possible process of the wars, and outcomes of postwar reconstruction. After the U.S.-led attack on Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, and its military invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, these big events were analyzed in the context of the international politics of the time. Since these two conflicts are coming to a conclusion, at least in their direct military scope, it is time to look back upon the forecasting framework to see whether alterations and improvements can be made. On December l8, 2011, all American combat troops pulled out of lraq, and the end is in sight for U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan-either in December 20l4, or thereafter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
095442
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Routledge, 2009.
|
Description |
xii, 366 p.
|
Series |
Security and governance series
|
Standard Number |
9780415776288, hkp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
054952 | 327.172/PAR 054952 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
152951
|
|
|
Publication |
Colorado, Kumarian Press, 2017.
|
Description |
vii, 255p.pbk
|
Standard Number |
9781626375680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059061 | 327.1/MOL 059061 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
133631
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
America's cumbersome approach to interagency operations in the field urgently needs reform, centered around more powerful ambassadors and coordinated in-country policy design.
SINCE THE 9/11 attacks, the United States has waged major postwar reconstruction campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan and similar but smaller programs in other countries that harbor Al Qaeda affiliates. Continued complex political, economic and military operations will be needed for many years to deal with the continuing threat from Al Qaeda and its associated organizations, much of it stemming from fragile states with weak institutions, high rates of poverty and deep ethnic, religious or tribal divisions. Despite thirteen years of experience-and innumerable opportunities to learn lessons from both successes and mistakes-there have been few significant changes in our cumbersome, inefficient and ineffective approach to interagency operations in the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
102298
|
|
|
Publication |
Boulder, Paradigm Publishers, 2010.
|
Description |
iv, 156p.
|
Standard Number |
9781594517150, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
055780 | 303.6/HEW 055780 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
169086
|
|
|
Publication |
Oxon, Routledge, 2009.
|
Description |
xx, 291p.: ill.pbk
|
Series |
Routledge Global Security Studies
|
Standard Number |
9780415544405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059761 | 355.028/MUG 059761 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
152121
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
How does third-party intervention in civil war influence citizens’ physical quality of life (QOL) after civil war? I find that the effects of intervention on postwar QOL depend on its type, unilateral intervention, and United Nations (UN) intervention. Unilateral interveners seeking self-interest tend to impede the improvement in postwar QOL particularly in terms of life expectancy and infant mortality rate. They are likely to do so through producing their protégé’s military victory or negotiated settlement, expanding their influence on postwar government, and resultingly forming a government less responsive to citizens’ hardship and reducing resources available for welfare. UN intervention on humanitarian grounds tends to promote postwar social development particularly in the fields of public health, although it has no significant effect on literacy rate. It is likely to do so by increasing resources available for postwar reconstruction, even though it goes where postwar social development is relatively difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
163619
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
054209
|
|
|
Publication |
Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
|
Description |
xx, 296p.
|
Series |
A project of the International Peace Academy
|
Standard Number |
0199263485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
048715 | 341.584/CHE 048715 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|