| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
097416
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Singapore, ISEAS, 2009.
|
| Description |
xxv, 417p.
|
| Standard Number |
9789812309631, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 055063 | 327.5094/TOW 055063 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
092228
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Singapore, ISEAS, 2009.
|
| Description |
xxiv, 417p.
|
| Standard Number |
9789812309631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:1,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location | IssuedTo | DueOn |
| 054602 | 327.5409/TOW 054602 | Main | Issued | General | | RF171 | 23-Feb-2024 |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
080908
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Recent changes of government in Australia and Japan, and a pending one in the United States, signifies a historical crossroads in these three allies' security politics in the Asia-Pacific region. In recent years, all three countries have tended to rationalize their strategic collaboration on the need to build innovative and competitive-oriented "strategic geometries" as a means to counter China's growing power and to meet new types of threats in the region. Yet the Australian Government under John Howard simultaneously pursued a hedging strategy, exploiting its growing economic relationship with China while strengthening its diplomatic and strategic profile with the United States. Despite Tokyo's own substantial economic relationship with Beijing, recent Japanese leaders were unable to pursue the same type of "dual track" strategy to the same extent as Howard. With Kevin Rudd's election as the new Australian Prime Minister and Yasuo Fukuda's ascent to power in Japan, prospects for Australia and Japan to cultivate more independent politico-security ties with Beijing have strengthened. If so, the evolving regional security postures of both these US allies may compel the United States to reassess its own traditional skepticism towards multilateral security groupings in the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
052152
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
|
| Description |
xv, 303p.
|
| Standard Number |
0521003687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 046031 | 355.03305/TOW 046031 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
019772
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2001.
|
| Description |
37-54
|
| Summary/Abstract |
How to deal with a rising China constitutes one of the most seminal challenges facing the ANZUS alliance since its inception a half a century ago. Australia must reconcile its geography and economic interests in Asia with its post-war strategic and historic cultural orientation towards the United States. It must succeed in this policy task without alienating either Beijing or Washington in the process. The extent to which this is achieved will shape Australia's national security posture for decades to come.
Three specific components of the 'Sino-American-Australian' triangle are assessed here: the future of Taiwan, the American development of a National Missile Defence (NMD), and the interplay between Sino-American power balancing and multilateral security politics. The policy stakes for Australia and for the continued viability of ANZUS are high in all three policy areas as a new US Administration takes office in early 2001. The article concludes that Australia's best interest is served by applying deliberate modes of decision-making in its own relations with both China and the US and by facilitating consistent and systematic dialogue and consultations with both of those great powers on key strategic issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
079849
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
026609
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Boulder, Westview Press, 1982.
|
| Description |
xxv, 309p.
|
| Series |
Westview special studies in International relations
|
| Standard Number |
0865310912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 020899 | 327.51047/STU 020899 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
118291
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hong Kong, Macmillan, 1984.
|
| Description |
Xiii,286p.
|
| Standard Number |
333351320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024606 | 355.033551/SEG 024606 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
130168
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Ongoing reassessments in U.S. strategy in the Asia-Pacific have coincided with a major growth in Sino-Australian economic relations. The Australian-American alliance could be increasingly tested if U.S. policy planners are unsuccessful in generating more sensitive and proactive alliance security postures to ensure Australian support for key U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
060805
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
165154
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Indo-Pacific region's security landscape is unfolding in highly uncertain and potentially explosive ways. The postwar American-led network of bilateral alliances – underpinned by concrete guarantees of extended deterrence and containment – is now yielding to a more diverse set of alignments and coalitions to manage an increasingly complex array of regional security issues. Multilateralism and minilateralism have emerged as two increasingly prominent forms of such cooperation. Minilateralism's informality and flexibility appeals to those who are sceptical about multilateralism's traditional focus on norm adherence and community-building even as great power competition in the Indo-Pacific is sharply intensifying. However, minilateralism's track record in the region is underdeveloped. The potential for this policy approach to be applied by the United States and its regional security partners as an enduring and credible means of diplomatic and security collaboration in the region will remain unfulfilled as long as the Trump administration's own geopolitical orientation remains uncertain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
095031
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
066711
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
079696
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
028395
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Boulder, Westview Press, 1982.
|
| Description |
xiv, 264p.
|
| Series |
Westview special studies in National security and defense policy
|
| Standard Number |
0865313873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 021133 | 355.031095/TOW 021133 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
130179
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Prospects for a U.S. decline in global power generated by political strife and protracted economic recession at home have affected Washington's regional diplomatic presence and strategic influence in the Asia-Pacific. Ongoing regional power politics and economic imperatives may constrain the ability of the U.S. to quickly recover from the largely self-imposed damage it has inflicted on its future role as a central regional player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
137897
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Visible U.S. efforts to sustain influence in the Asia-Pacific met with mixed success. President Barack Obama’s visit to the region reinforced alliance commitments, but U.S. policy momentum on regional trade and diplomacy remained sluggish. Washington’s effective management of its relations with Beijing remains the key factor to how well the U.S. will fare with other regional actors and issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
093784
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Architecture' has emerged as the new catchphrase in Asian security politics. Despite its growing centrality, insufficient attention has thus far been given to defining the term, often leading to its imprecise usage. This article seeks to redress that shortcoming. It reviews the ways in which various scholars and practitioners have employed the term 'security architecture' and highlights the anomalies that their often differing employment has created. The article proposes a set of guidelines to aid conceptualisation and application of the term. In so doing it establishes criteria to ascertain what 'security architecture' actually exists in the Asian region, and must ultimately exist to assure regional security.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|