Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
115612
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
America's expanding military footprint in Asia may be more of a provocation than a deterrent to China's aggressive behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
139110
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Has the US military become a learning institution, one able to transition from relying on a conventional war model to fighting against irregular adversaries such as insurgents and terrorists? This article examines the United States' interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan in an effort to respond to this question. It shows that there are two major ways for a military to fail to be a ‘learning’ institution: It may stick to its old dogma or – adopt a flawed new one. Those who saw counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine as the best way to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan made the US military into a learning organization – but taught it the wrong lesson. They failed to take into account the absence of the sociological conditions that make a post-conflict environment amenable to nation-building, which is an integral part of the main variants of counterinsurgency. The article closes by outlining the foremost reasons the US military continues to be a poorly adaptive organization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
132285
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Foreign Legions in the generic sense have evolved in ways that would surprise Beau Geste. Not only are more foreigners or recent immigrants enlisting in Western military forces, but also the post-Cold War era has seen the revival of warlord militias and Private Military Companies. Western militaries, in particular that of the United States, have also sought to increase their strategic reach through security assistance to regional military forces. While there have been some successes, security assistance has proven to have its limitations, not to mention unintended consequences for civil military relations, democracy promotion, and military efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
067779
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
083761
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
057167
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
102943
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Will Clayton, a principal architect of the United States' post-1945 plans, was committed to trade liberalization as a path to economic recovery. This article examines Clayton's efforts to secure early commitment from Western European nations to economic integration, as he negotiated details of the United States' offer of Marshall Plan aid to Europe in 1947. It focuses on his attempts to persuade an unwilling Britain to assume leadership of this cause. It examines the contradictions between the practicalities of achieving closer European economic integration and the non-discrimination provisions of the proposed International Trade Organization. Tensions are examined between Clayton and his colleagues over the priority to be accorded to closer European economic integration. It concludes that, although Clayton was not successful in obtaining a clear commitment from the Europeans to economic integration, he did much to further the intellectual arguments and establish the climate where this became a reality within ten years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
032479
|
|
|
Publication |
New York, Faets on File Publications, 1987.
|
Description |
570p.Hbk
|
Standard Number |
0816018154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
032113 | 909.824/VAD 032113 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|