| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
105316
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
International relations are social actions, and their expression is behavior of the states. According to French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, the basis for any social action is habitus and capital (Bourdieu 1982). For Bourdieu, social action is not created in a vacuum but always takes place under certain social conditions. Different social conditions create different spheres that Bourdieu called action fields. The problem is that each field has its own rules, logic and goals. Bourdieu also uses the metaphor of game to explain the concept of field. Like the fields each game has also its own rules and logic. In order to participate in the game players are required to have some knowledge of game, and capacity, skills, and last but not least the interests to play game. The field of the Asia-Pacific region in the beginning of twenty-first century and especially during recent years is one of "center court" of the whole world involving all big players like the US, China, Japan, Russia and India. Their presence with their own behavior and different abilities, interests make this field more interesting, but at the same time more complicated and unpredictable. This article explores the different phases of Vietnam's foreign policy since reform in 1986 and joining ASEAN and adoption of "Resolution No. 8 (section IX) on the Strategy for Fatherland Defence in the New Context" in 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
053836
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Japan, National Institute For Defense Studies, 1996.
|
| Description |
343p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039161 | 355.0095/NAT 039161 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
053852
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Japan, National Institute For Defense Studies, 1996.
|
| Description |
343p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039160 | 355.0095/NAT 039160 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
006325
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis, 1996.
|
| Description |
207p.
|
| Standard Number |
8186619073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 038017 | 320.95/MAT 038017 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 038018 | 320.95/MAT 038018 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
105717
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article argues that Japan matters crucially in the evolving East Asian security order because it is embedded both in the structural transition and the ongoing regional strategies to manage it. The post-Cold War East Asian order transition centres on the disintegration of the post-Second World War Great Power bargain that saw Japan subjecting itself to extraordinary strategic constraint under the US alliance, leaving the conundrum of how to negotiate a new bargain that would keep the peace between Japan and China. To manage the uncertainties of this transition, East Asian states have adopted a three-pronged strategy of: maintaining US military preponderance; socializing China as a responsible regional great power; and cultivating regionalism as the basis for a long-term East Asian security community. Japan provides essential public goods for each of these three elements: it keeps the US anchored in East Asia with its security treaty; it is the one major regional power that can and has helped to constrain the potential excesses of growing Chinese power while at the same time crucially engaging with and helping to socialize China; and its economic and political participation is critical for meaningful regionalism and regional integration. It does not need to be a fully fledged, 'normal' Great Power in order to carry out these roles. As the region tries to mediate the growing security dilemma among the three great powers, Japan's importance to regional security will only grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
092700
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
084944
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
057545
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
East Asia suffers from a security dilemma at the centre of which are two seemingly intractable issues: the standoff between the two Koreas and increasing tension betwwen China and Taiwan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
077319
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
103427
|
|
|