|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
081761
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2008.
|
| Description |
xv, 291p.
|
| Series |
Warwick studies in globalization; 10
|
| Standard Number |
9780415425346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053457 | 303.6/DEV 053457 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
167508
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Japan’s security discourse – despite accelerating shifts in its security stance over the last two decades, and more recently, under the Abe administration – remains dominated by views of essential continuity and maintenance of the “Yoshida Doctrine.” The case of Japan’s militarization of space is used to create a framework for systematically dismantling default assumptions about the durability of the Yoshida Doctrine. The militarization of space serves as a driver of broader trends in Japan’s security policy manifested in the procurement of dual-use assets in launch systems, communications and intelligence satellites, and counterspace capabilities necessary for active internal and external balancing with the US–Japan alliance; the strengthening domestically of security policymaking institutions; and the jettisoning of anti-militaristic norms. Japan’s increasingly assertive military stance, bolstering of the US–Japan alliance and cessation of hedging, facing down of China’s rise, and departure from the Yoshida Doctrine as grand strategy are thus revealed as hiding in plain sight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
145547
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Japan has long been regarded by mainstream International Relations theories as a status quo power intent on pursuing an immobilist international strategy towards China characterized by hedging rather than any move to active balancing. The article argues that the conditions that are thought to encourage hedging behaviour—the predictability of other states’ intentions, the malleability of intentions through engagement, domestic preferences that obviate balancing, and a favourable offence–defence balance—are now deteriorating in the case of Japan’s strategy towards China. The consequence is that evidence is mounting of Japan’s shift towards active ‘soft’ and incipient ‘hard’ balancing of China through a policy of active ‘encirclement’ of China diplomatically, the build-up of Japanese national military capabilities aimed to counter China’s access denial and power projection, and the strengthening of the US–Japan alliance. This shift has become particularly evident since the 2010 trawler incident, and the return to power in 2012 of Prime Minister Abe Shinzō. The consequences of Japan’s shifting strategy are not yet clear. Japan may be moving towards a form of ‘Resentful Realism’ that does not add new equilibrium to regional security but is actually more destabilizing and poses risks for China and the USA, especially as Japan’s own security intentions become more opaque. These conclusions, in turn, invite a reconsideration of the comfortable theoretical consensus on Japan as an eternal status quo power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
151424
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Japan has been overlooked as a ‘cyber power’ but it now becoming a serious player in this new strategic domain. Japanese policy-makers have forged a consensus to move cybersecurity to the very core of national security policy, to create more centralized frameworks for cybersecurity, and for Japan’s military institutions to build dynamic cyberdefense capabilities. Japan’s stance has moved rapidly toward the securitization and now militarization of responses to cyber challenges. Japan’s cybersecurity stance has bolstered US–Japan alliance responses to securing all dimensions of the ‘global commons’ and extended its defense perimeter to further deter but potentially raise tensions with China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
177917
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Abe era has produced a significant increase in Japan’s geopolitical assertiveness, which is likely to endure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
048330
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 1999.
|
| Description |
xxii, 234p.
|
| Series |
Sheffield Centre for Japanese studies/Routledge series
|
| Standard Number |
0415201837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 041554 | 338.952/HUG 041554 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
049770
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2001.
|
| Description |
xxxvi, 532p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415240972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 044590 | 327.52/HOO 044590 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
077376
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
059082
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
|
| Description |
156p.
|
| Series |
Adelphi paper; 368-9
|
| Standard Number |
0198567588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 049132 | 355.033252/HUG 049132 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
088255
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, for International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2009.
|
| Description |
186p.
|
| Series |
Adelphi Paper, 403
|
| Standard Number |
978415556927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054186 | 355.033252/HUG 054186 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
155093
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Japan has featured prominently in The Pacific Review (TPR) since the journal's inception; and the very first issue in 1988 was essentially a Japan special issue with four out of six articles devoted to considering the implications of the country's then seemingly relentless rise as a regional and increasingly global power. Thereafter, TPR has carefully documented Japan's changing international pathway, forming indispensable reading for all Japan experts. TPR has always been distinguished by a rare ability to question the conventional wisdom on the study of Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
051186
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004.
|
| Description |
ix, 287p.
|
| Standard Number |
158826260X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 048142 | 355.033052/HUG 048142 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
057642
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
079067
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
076788
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
108074
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2011.
|
| Description |
xv, 449p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780415326018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 056278 | 355.033/HUG 056278 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
104917
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Routledge, 2011.
|
| Description |
xv, 451p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780415326001, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 056124 | 355.033/HUG 056124 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
105084
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Japan's defense production model is often portrayed as an exemplar of techno-nationalism, but can it serve as a model for China to follow in pursuit of technological military catch-up? Japan in the past has exploited civilian industrial strengths to create a defense production base with footholds in key technologies. However, Japan's defense production model is now displaying structural limits - constrained defense budgets, deficient procurement management, limited international collaboration - with the risks of civilian industry exiting the sector, the loss of even basic competency in military technologies, and the consequent weakening of national security autonomy. Japan's case thus offers emerging comparative lessons for China to study in what to do and not to in pursuing civilian-military integration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
088391
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Japan's reemergence as a "normal" military power has been accelerated by the "super-sizing" of North Korea: a product of the North's extant military threat, multiplied exponentially by its undermining of U.S.-Japan alliance solidarity, views of the North as a domestic "peril," and the North's utilization as a catch-all proxy for remilitarization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
073665
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article seeks to make sense of the policy debate on constitutional revision underway in Japan, to consider what international and domestic factors are driving the debate forward, to assess the range of proposals currently on the table, and to gauge the likelihood of actual constitutional change. Additionally, it considers how various forms of constitutional revision, if actually implemented, might affect Japan's military doctrines and capabilities; the extent of its alliance cooperation with the United States; its devotion of military capabilities to un operations; and the repercussions for Japan's regional relations in East Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|