| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
171992
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, KW Publishers Pvt Ltd, 2020.
|
| Description |
xliv, 198p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789389137590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 059878 | 327.56/ROY 059878 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 059879 | 327.56/ROY 059879 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
057759
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
184535
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
154284
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the opening weeks of his administration, President Donald Trump overturned a longstanding U.S. commitment to territorial partition and a two-state model for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu seized the opportunity to demand “overriding security control over the entire area west of the Jordan River” while exploring regional approaches that bypass the Palestinians. At the same time, a host of Israeli politicians are reviving older models such as limited autonomy without political sovereigntyand partial territorial annexation, or advocating for other forms of separation with Israel’s continued control. The resulting middle ground—neither two states nor one—poses a great risk to Palestinian self-determination. By situating recent developments in a broader historical context going back to the autonomy plan of Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, this essay provides an overview of a shifting political discourse and examines the consequences for the fate of the Palestinians today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
139364
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
We’ is often constructed and characterised on the basis of ‘What We are Not’—the ‘Other’. Consolidation of the ‘self’ is done through the construction of the Xenophobia within the society. Nationalism; be it ethnic or political, be it in India or in West Asia; arises to protect or emancipate ‘we’ from the ‘Other’ or ‘Outsider’. Needless to say, the definition and preconditions of being ‘we’ and ‘outsider’ is determined by the elites of the concerned community and becomes the narrative for the entire community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
082859
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
161103
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article provides an outline of the project of queer theory and the ways that this project has (and has not) engaged with the question of Palestine. Ultimately, the author argues that queer theory and Palestinian liberation share, albeit perhaps unwittingly, a defining resistance to elimination and an enduring commitment to unsettlement. As such, queer politics is and can surely become decolonial praxis, just as decolonization has a clear affinity with dissident queer resistance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|