| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
065621
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
030509
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hampshire, macmillan Press, 1989.
|
| Description |
ix, 374p.
|
| Series |
International Institute for strategic studies conference papers
|
| Standard Number |
0333510909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 031363 | 327.116/HEI 031363 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
020064
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
p61-94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
065563
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
128842
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The single currency was supposed to have led to greater political union, but the policies taken to ensure its survival are having the opposite effect. An orderly retreat from the euro might be the EU's least-bad option. As the euro area enters its seventh year of economic stagnation, the future of the European integration process remains in suspense. In the medium-to-long term, highly divergent scenarios remain possible, with variable degrees of likelihood, from full-blown federalisation at one extreme to the catastrophic collapse of the euro and of the European Union at the other. Somewhere in between comes the actual set of policies currently followed, sometimes described as 'muddling through', more aptly called 'muddling down' in terms of its effects on growth and mass unemployment. Since the middle of 2012, the mix of recessive policies of 'internal devaluation', limited pooling of eurozone liabilities and decisive intervention by the European Central Bank (ECB) have deferred for an undetermined period of time the risk of a disorderly break-up of the euro. The strategic consequences of this range of potential and actual policy paths have been discussed in previous issues of Survival.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
065587
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2000.
|
| Description |
p.5-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
060757
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jul-Sep 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
035785
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1989.
|
| Description |
252p.pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0080375693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:1,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 031365 | 355.03/IIS 031365 | Main | On Shelf | Reference books | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
023141
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
135-156
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In September 2002, one year after the terrorist calamities in New York and Washington, the IISS convened its first ‘Global Strategic Review’ in London. For the meeting's concluding panel, three eminent analysts were asked to assess the prospects for forging a Western ‘grand strategy’ against terrorism and other threats in the new international environment. The panel focused on the nature of US foreign policy and how allies respond to it, and how the US deals with its allies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
138789
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
During the two decades preceding the Russian annexation of Crimea, Western powers did not have a comprehensive strategy towards Russia because they perceived no need to devise one. The West did have a full-spectrum strategy for inclusion of the former members of the Warsaw Pact and the Baltic States into NATO and the European Union, to create a trategically and societally unified space in a ‘Europe whole and free’.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
065663
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1998.
|
| Description |
p.77-92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
025849
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1990.
|
| Description |
vi, 227p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
0333532228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 032880 | 947.0854/HEI 032880 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
146350
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the spring of 2015, a sudden change occurred in population flows between the southern and northern banks of the Mediterranean. Overall numbers of new asylum seekers climbed from fewer than 58,000 in April to close to 89,000 in June. The number of new applicants hailing from Syria nearly doubled, from slightly under 11,000 to close to 21,000.1 This was just the beginning; the wave of refugees picked up during the summer, with the movement of some 190,000 Syrians during July, August and September 2015, three times the number that had arrived during the same period in 2014. This would represent a yearly rate of around 672,000. By late October, a cumulative total of 507,000 Syrians were seeking or had secured an abode within the European Union.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
119763
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The war in Mali broke out on 11 January 2013 in the form of an out-of-theblue French offensive against two armed columns heading towards Bamako, the country's capital. During the following weeks, a brigade-sized French force, accompanied by a similar number of soldiers from West African countries, reclaimed an area the size of Texas from jihadist groups, which in spring 2012 proclaimed to have set up an independent territory called Azawad in the northern 60% of Mali.1 Although the war in Mali was not a blitzkrieg, as claimed by some, in some ways it can be considered a harbinger of postmodern conflict.2 The war may yet slide into a strategic dead end reminiscent of Iraq and Afghanistan, but such a fate is not preordained.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|