|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
018564
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Autumn 2000.
|
| Description |
207-229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
057085
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
067695
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
DelhI, Isha Books, 2006.
|
| Description |
319p.
|
| Standard Number |
8182051789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050635 | 200.9541/RAA 050635 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
004270
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt Ltd, 1970.
|
| Description |
v 1(vi, 397)p.
|
| Contents |
Vol. 1 Adi Parva
|
| Standard Number |
8121501869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 034859 | 294.5923/GAN 034859 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
024037
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
4th
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1981.
|
| Description |
v, 63p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025986 | 294.5923/GAN 025986 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
026025
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1970.
|
| Description |
v 2(vi, 401p.)
|
| Contents |
Vol. II Sabha Parva
Vana Parva-Part 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025976 | 294.5923/GAN 025976 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
026026
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1970.
|
| Description |
v 7(vi, 531p.)
|
| Contents |
V 7 Karna Parva
Salya Parva
Sauptika Parva
Stree Parva
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025981 | 294.5923/GAN 025981 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
026027
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1970.
|
| Description |
v 6(vi, 492)p.
|
| Contents |
V 6 Drona Parva
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025980 | 294.5923/GAN 025980 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
026028
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1970.
|
| Description |
v 4(vi, 505)p.
|
| Contents |
V 4 Virata Parva
Udyoga Parva
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 025978 | 294.5923/GAN 025978 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
066451
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
DelhI, Permanent Black, 2005.
|
| Description |
ix, 364p.
|
| Standard Number |
8178241390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050288 | 320.54/AUR 050288 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
006244
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
DelhI, Oxford University Press, 1996.
|
| Description |
v3(xii,602p.)
|
| Standard Number |
0195634586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 037948 | 300.954/SAT 037948 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
021291
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2002.
|
| Description |
63-89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
022615
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2002.
|
| Description |
54-76
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article examines historical developments over the past 200 years, but especially in the nineteenth century, that provide the background and context for defining the relationship between the state and religious institutions in modern India. That relationship was described by the British government of India as a policy of neurality and non-interference; the declaration in India's Constitution that India is a secular state appears to be a reiteration of this position. Yet the acrimonious discussion surrounding the meaning of "secular" in contemporary India indictes that the issue is far more complex. Early manifestations of this issue can be traced to contradictorary pressures on India's British rulers. Christian groups objected to the East India Company continuing the policy of the former Muslim rulers of giving support to Hindu and Muslim religious institutions, and to the Company's refusal to permit missionaries to work in its territories. Other groups feared any government support for Christian activity that attacked Hindu and Muslim beliefs and practices. Still others argued that in becoming rulers, the British had made a "compact" to preserve Indian rights and usages. Non-interference or the "colonial compromise" was a policy to deal with these pressures. The colonial government, like India's present day government, was continually forced to become involved in religious activities; non-intervention, then, like secularism today, was an attempt to work within the framework of Indian social and political realities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
054986
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
022613
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2002.
|
| Description |
1-32
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article challenges the argument that the conceptual and normative structure of secularism in India is itself terribly flawed. It shows that, first, ignoring the plurality within the western secular tradition, criticisms of secularism are directed against a particular, unattractive and perhaps least defensible variant of secularism for which religion must necessarily be privatized; and, second, that they wrongly identify this variant to be providing normative guidelines to the Indian state. Third, what developed in India is a distinctively Indian yet modern variant of secularism that, rather than erect a strict wall of separation, proposed a "principled distance" between religion and state. Further, by balancing the claims of individuals and religious communities, it never intended a bludgeoning privatization of religion. It also shows that a departure from a strict liberal-individualist model does not compromise the core principles of secularism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|