| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
022026
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March-April 2002.
|
| Description |
18-23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
022974
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov 2002.
|
| Description |
42-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
019912
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
289-301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
107457
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
055209
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
060478
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2005.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
According to President George W. Bush, we are living amidst ‘the first war of the twenty-first century’. How then should the United Kingdom react? It is suggested that at least two strands of legal policy and response should be considered. The first concerns the design of antiterrorism laws and policies. For the purposes of this paper, the remit will be confined to how antiterrorism laws have responded to the threat from biological attack. The second aspect concerns the laws and policies about terrorism risk management, part of the agenda of which takes us back to threats to health from biological attack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
023048
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
341-355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
018747
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
p93-106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
057631
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
021625
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
June 2002.
|
| Description |
30-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
065991
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
080826
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
055733
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
053506
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jul-Aug 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
022631
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
8-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
023652
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March, 2003.
|
| Description |
8-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
005789
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Canadian Security Intelligence Service, 1995.
|
| Description |
212p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 037225 | 303.625/PUR 037225 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
090640
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Bush administration's strong preference for seemingly more flexible initiatives, involving a select group of countries, and limiting the size of international bureaucracies, which has resulted in three US-driven multilateral initiatives to address the threat of WMD-terrorism - the Proliferation Security Initiative, the G-8 Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 and the committee and group of experts it established - has produced mixed results so far. Although it helped to ensure a more rapid initial response to WMD terrorism, such an approach has also impeded efforts to build and sustain global support to respond to that threat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
057407
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
023131
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
129-140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|