|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
058784
|
|
|
Publication |
Apr-Sep 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
146968
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
n terms of regional dimensions, the North East Asian identity of Mongolia, together with socio-economic and political ties with other countries (particularly in Asia) generate much scope for further expansion and concretisation of India-Mongolian cooperation in various sectors. Herein, the political role of Buddhism takes precedence in guiding engagements with foreign partners and institutions. Therefore, Buddhism - both as a religion and as a soft power foreign policy tool - must be seen in the context of achieving the goals of peaceful co-existence, ensuring friendship from generation to generation, and furthering mutual development through cooperation in terms of foreign policy objectives. Buddhism in Mongolia’s foreign policy perspectives may prove to be beneficial not only in the smooth execution of relations with countries like India but also with Russia as well as other countries of East Asia, including both Southeast and Northeast Asia where Buddhist communities exist in large numbers.
The convergence of political, economic and social interests may get a definite push in Mongolia’s bilateral and multilateral relations if its Buddhist diplomacy succeeds, especially in the Asian context. In this vein, PM Modi’s Mongolia visit can be described as a “strategic step” in order to make India’s strong presence felt in East Asia in general, and Northeast Asia, including Mongolia, in particular.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
091148
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
As regards India's policy towards Tibet, the evolution of India's Tibet policy can be traced back to its pre-independence period. Between 1947 and 1954, India's Tibet policy moved around recognising Tibet as an independent nation. And Tibet did participate as an independent country at the first Asian relations conference held in New Delhi in March-April 1947, just a few months before India gained its formal independence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
062576
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
076254
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2007.
|
Description |
xix, 206p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
8182742676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
052321 | 951.705/BAT 052321 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
099731
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2010.
|
Description |
xiii, 374p.
|
Standard Number |
9788182744851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
055374 | 327.517/WAR 055374 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
071936
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2006.
|
Description |
xix, 328p.
|
Standard Number |
8182741963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
051309 | 327.5710517/SON 051309 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
104569
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
137020
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
While focusing on the ‘third neighbour’ approach of Mongolia’s diplomacy of external relations, this article seeks to examine the effects of this new approach on India–Mongolia relations. It delves into the evolution of Mongolia’s ‘third neighbour’ policy and its implementation into forging a mutually beneficial cooperation in diverse areas with such ‘third neighbour’ nations or a group of nations that could help balance Mongolia’s two geographic neighbours—Russia and China. The article argues that such third neighbours have been identified to bolster Mongolia’s development, invest, and encourage the democratic transition/consolidation that is under way. In the case of India, ever since it began to be considered as one of Mongolia’s third neighbours, their relationship has witnessed a sea change, that is, the bilateral relations turned into a comprehensive partnership. Contrary to the ordinary viewpoint, the argument here is that India remains an important country for Mongolia in both regional and international contexts, particularly in the context of India’s role in promoting a multi-polar security structure in Asia. The Mongolians concede India’s positive influence on them and desire that the strong cultural relationship based on Buddhist traditions between the two sides should be translated into a strategic partnership. This is more so because Mongolia’s proximity with India appears to be a significant factor to balance off the equation with China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
107674
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In recent years what has been witnessed is that Indians have been encouraged to study contemporary China not only due to the cultural richness of that civilization, but also because of China's already significant influence on world events. In fact, with the incorporation of Tibet into the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1950 and the Government of India's oft-repeated official acknowledgement of Tibet as an autonomous region of China, the PRC ceased to be a 'distant neighbour' and became as proximate to India as the states of the Indian subcontinent itself. Obviously, for Indian scholars whose prime focus is South Asia, there is an imperative to study China as well. Tibet, which has been one of the key areas of China studies, needs to be researched comprehensively so as to gauge the extent of its influence on China studies in India in general and India-China relations in particular. It is in this context that this paper seeks to examine how academics, journalists, policy makers, politicians and China studies experts in India have viewed Tibet so far as its influence on India-China relations in the broader context is concerned. It also highlights the viewpoints of Chinese scholars on such issue, besides examining whether Tibet would continue to be an important factor impacting China Studies in India.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
097814
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The research note provides an overview of Tibetan refugee settlements in South Asia, viz. in India, Nepal and Bhutan. The note focuses on the residential status of Tibetans and their life and livelihood. Tibetan refugees are viewed as representatives of Tibetan culture and religion in these countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
060586
|
|
|
Publication |
Oct-Dec 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
058785
|
|
|
Publication |
Apr-Sep 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
084137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|