| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
149557
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Aleph Book Company, 2016.
|
| Description |
216p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9789384067687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058918 | 923.2/BAR 058918 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
148750
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
129480
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
India, Penguin Books India Pvt Ltd, 2014.
|
| Description |
xvi, 301p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780670086740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057715 | 923.254/BAR 057715 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
141134
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
058937
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India over the past century has been characterized by sharp inter-regional variation, with western, north-western and southern India recording higher rates of growth than eastern, central, north-central and north-eastern India. Explanations for this have focused on regional variations in the agrarian economy dating to the colonial period. After independence, planning and fiscal policy were deployed to rectify regional disparities, but have not fared well. During the 1990s, while some middle-income states have been able to improve their position, the backward regions have yet to move to a higher growth trajectory. This paper argues that public investment can, in fact, accelerate economic development in backward regions, but only when the pre-conditions for private enterprise development already exist. Regions that have not made the transition to agrarian capitalism are unlikely to urbanize and industrialize. Worse, a century of backwardness can engender inertia and despair. This remains an important challenge for the future of India’s economic reforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
113157
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Geo-economics may be defined in two different ways: as the relationship between economic policy and changes in national power and geopolitics (in other words, the geopolitical consequences of economic phenomena); or as the economic consequences of trends in geopolitics and national power. Both the notion that 'trade follows the flag' (that the projection of national power has economic consequences) and that 'the flag follows trade' (that there are geopolitical consequences of essentially economic phenomena) point to the subject matter of geo-economics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
086223
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Major economic upheavals do have geopolitical consequences. These are not necessarily enduring or irreversible. The geopolitical implications of a 'big bang' economic phenomenon may unfold over a longer period of time or may be quite dramatic. Much would depend on a complex range of both domestic and external political and social factors. Hence, it would be wrong to rush to any conclusion regarding the geopolitical implications of the current global financial and economic crisis. Further, the past need not always be a guide to the future, given the complexity of change that has already occurred or is underway across different parts of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
169696
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the Chief Guest at the fifth meeting of the Eastern Economic Forum (EEF) held at Vladivostok, Russia in early September 2019. The Prime Minister’s participation in this meeting underscored India’s growing interest in building closer economic ties with the Russian Far East. India and Russia have long shared geopolitical perspectives on the balance of power across Eurasia. In the post-Cold War era, both turned their attention to the West. However, over the past decade India has pursued a “Look East Policy”, seeking to regain its political and economic influence in South-east Asia and building new strategic partnerships with East Asian powers like Japan and South Korea. Russia’s ‘pivot to the East’ and India’s move from ‘Look East’ to ‘Act East’ have created a new framework for closer India-Russia geo-economic and geopolitical relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
147474
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Academic Foundation, 2016.
|
| Description |
240p.Hbk
|
| Standard Number |
09789332703797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058789 | 337.54/BAR 058789 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
169476
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Long before the Atlantic and the Pacific became theatres for commerce and conflict, the Indian Ocean was home to considerable commercial and cultural intercourse. Most recent literature has, however, focused on maritime security and sea power while greater attention ought to be paid to economic development around the Indian Ocean. India’s plans for the development of the ‘Blue Economy’ augurs well for the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
178223
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Gurgaon, Penguin Random House India Pvt Ltd, 2021.
|
| Description |
xvii, 243p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780670092444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060007 | 305.5/BAR 060007 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
091479
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
I sincerely believe that in the modern world the relationship between Governments is increasingly mediated through and influenced by the relationship between civil society and the business community. It is on the foundation of people-to-people and business-to-business relations that we in Government try to build State-to-State relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
158603
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
072393
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Academic Foundation, 2006.
|
| Description |
496p.
|
| Standard Number |
8171885586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:4/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 051346 | 338.4735500954/BAR 051346 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 051566 | 338.4735500954/BAR 051566 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 051567 | 338.4735500954/BAR 051567 | Main | Withdrawn | General | |
| 052207 | 338.4735500954/BAR 052207 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
166124
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The escalation of tariffs by the United States (US) on imports from China has launched what has been called a “trade war”. While economists generally do not approve of such actions and view them as zero sum games, the US-China tiff should be viewed as part of a political response, externally to China’s growing assertiveness and internally to domestic criticism of China, by an increasingly depressed US working class that supports President Donald Trump. While President Trump initiated the action, there is bipartisan support in the US to actions that would limit China’s rising power. The US action should be viewed as part of a “geo-economic containment” of China’s economic growth. The US hopes a growth slowdown would hurt China economically and its present leadership politically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|