| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
055493
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
075093
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
007852
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Summer 1995.
|
| Description |
195-198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
008125
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
012193
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
19-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
011376
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Feb 1997.
|
| Description |
21-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
008571
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 1995.
|
| Description |
81-95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
007853
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Summer 1995.
|
| Description |
212-216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
010331
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1996.
|
| Description |
31-57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
011130
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
spring/summer 1996.
|
| Description |
131-136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
011567
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 1997.
|
| Description |
1581-1583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
076124
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
021996
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May/June 2002.
|
| Description |
440-455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
020477
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Fall 2001.
|
| Description |
203-221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
005389
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Taipei, Chung-Hua Institute for Economic Research, 1994.
|
| Description |
30p.
|
| Series |
CIER. Occasional Paper;9408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036613 | 337.1/WAN 036613 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
018886
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Nov-Dec 2000.
|
| Description |
177-204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
019798
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
195-220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
051673
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Mar 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
013098
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
80-92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
082658
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The trade and environment interface has become a topic of growing importance. Until the early 1990s, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation(WTO), were the major forums to address the relationship between trade and the environment. Significant progress in this area has not yet been made. Since the 1990s, environmental issues have been addressed by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and in recent times by trans-regional and bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) such as the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (SEP), the U.S.-Singapore FTA (USSFTA), the Canada-Chile FTA or the New Zealand-Thailand Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEP). Not only questions on the effectiveness of FTAs in global and regional environmental governance arise but also on the various actors involved in these negotiations. The question here is whether the integration of environmental issues in FTAs is a top-down approach, leaving the negotiations and implementation of environment cooperation frameworks in the hands of governments, or whether environmental arrangements are the result of a multi-stakeholder dialogue, consequently committing governments, the private sector and civil society to the objective of making trade and environmental policies mutually supportive. This article seeks to address these questions by analysing environmental issues and stakeholder participation in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), the Trans-Pacific SEP and the New Zealand-Thailand CEP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|