| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
090233
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Strategic stability in South Asia is hardly stable; and ever prone to further destabilization. Twice since going nuclear in 1998, India and Pakistan have faced the danger of an inadvertent nuclear war. Nuclear weapons have been significant in all India-Pakistan confrontations/conflict since the mid-1980 - Brasstacks 1986-87, Compound Crisis 1990, Kargil 1999 and Military Standoff 2002 - when they were inducted into the strategic discourse in the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
146744
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Indo-Pakistan conflict is the direct consequence of the imbalance of power between the two states and Pakistani non-acceptance of this imbalance. India has always looked upon Pakistan as a sovereign state and has conducted its relations accordingly. It would be an ideal solution if both India and Pakistan could sort out their differences diplomatically and if pressure from the International community as well as Indian / Chinese influence could scale back the military – jihadi elite and promote genuine democracy in the country. This could lead Pakistan to become another Turkey / Germany or Japan in the region and bringing in prosperity to the area. But according to Neo-realists, the gross imbalance between India and Pakistan and Pakistani attempts to balance Indian strength rather than bandwagon it, will not allow any entente to emerge between the two countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
031189
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
DelhI, Oxford University Press, 1983.
|
| Description |
xi, 285p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
0862321719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 024889 | 954.9205/HAR 024889 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|