| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
078463
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
129535
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
All players expect explanation from China of its initiative to build a New Economic Silk Road. The faster it presents arguments and the clearer they are, the less room there will be for idle speculation and rumor. In any case, China is interested in a favorable response and support for its own foreign policy signals. Chinese leader Xi Jinping first came up with the idea of creating a Silk Road economic space as foreign policy priority for the current, fifth generation of national leaders during a visit in September 2013 to Kazakhstan. In view of the crucial and long-term character of his intention, it is in Russia's interests, as a European and Pacific power and as China's neighbor and long-term bilateral strategic partner, to take a closer look at what content China is putting into this newly conceived project and how the Asian power plans to implement it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
104751
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, VIJ Books India, 2011.
|
| Description |
298p.
|
| Standard Number |
9789380177533, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 056013 | 327.54051/SIN 056013 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
171551
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Hugh White discusses the choices Australia faces in defence provision and what they mean for New Zealand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
059562
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
082181
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article argues that China's foreign policy since 1991 has been guided by the evolution of a grand strategy of "peaceful rise" that seeks to ensure China's smooth transition to great power status. Moreover, it suggests that a strategic preoccupation with Central Asia has become an important expression of this grand strategy. Framing these arguments is a third overarching one that postulates that China's foreign policy in Central Asia is not only intimately related to the strategy of "peaceful rise" but also to a particular, historically and geopolitically informed narrative of China's "Inner Asian" power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
133966
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A growing body of literature has focused on an alleged "power shift" from the United States to China (and from the West to the East more generally). For all its complexities and nuances, much of this power-shift literature continues to unreflectively hold onto a conventional way of conceptualizing power as a type of quantitatively measurable and zero-sum property possessed by the state. Without critically engaging with the conceptual question of what power means, however, the power-shift debate is both inadequate and misleading. Drawing on some alternative ways of conceptualizing power, I aim to illustrate the contingent and socially constructed nature of "Chinese" economic power and, in doing so, problematize the widely held view of a US-China power shift. I contend that insofar as power is socially constructed, how it is conceptualized matters for international relations. The need to rethink power is at the core of building a new type of major power relationship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
133965
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In this article I consider the general idea of power shifts, with specific reference to the discourse on "China's rise." I raise theoretical and policy concerns about the nature, sources, and consequences of China's reemergence as a regional power, and call attention to some analytic tendencies and implicit assumptions featured in this discourse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
119313
|
|
|