Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
177538
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
STUDIES of various aspects of mass communication have lately become one of the most common fields of scholarly research in humanities. Researchers have been taking up subjects such as information revolutions, information wars, the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in international affairs, digital diplomacy, and transnational communication networks. However, any of these forms exists in a specific context, is governed by specific norms and rules, and may be institutionalized and legitimized by a specific government agency and/or international organization. We may sum up by saying that they all are regulated by specific communication orders and regimes and influence those orders and regimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
093728
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
TODAY I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK about the fundamental issues of contemporary diplomacyits subject and method. Ours is the time of sweeping transformations which call for profound comprehension, otherwise the diplomacy of any state might lose its contacts with reality and, therefore, its efficiency of a foreign policy instrument. The examples are too recent to be neglected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
031322
|
|
|
Publication |
Frankfurt, Campus Verlag, 1981.
|
Description |
389p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
021593 | 327.1720014/SAK 021593 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
030727
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, South Asian Publishers, 1982.
|
Description |
ix, 290p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
020121 | 327.17/BAN 020121 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
134310
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This paper analyses how Taiwan exercises “soft power” and uses public diplomacy to engage with the international community, and to compensate for the absence of formal diplomatic relations with major powers. The research suggests that Taiwan’s strategies of international engagement are constrained by its external and internal political environments. The international system (structure) has locked Taiwan into a set of challenging arrangements over which it has little control or influence, while Taiwan’s public diplomacy architecture and the activities organised and undertaken by its government agencies in Taibei and its representatives abroad (agency) reveal, at best, a misunderstanding of how Taiwan’s soft power might be exercised more effectively. The strategic thematic choices of legitimacy (invoking Taiwan’s international status) versus credibility (which in soft power terms offers the most benefit), and the decision to privilege cultural over political themes in international communications, all have profound effects on the success of Taiwan’s soft power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|