| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
056272
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
065426
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
|
| Description |
x, 207p.
|
| Series |
Studies in diplomacy and international relations
|
| Standard Number |
1403992258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050087 | 327.2/JON 050087 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
116852
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
From the outset in the mid-1980s the international response to hiv/aids has been characterised by an emphasis on the human rights aspects of the pandemic, and on recognition of the pivotal role of civil society actors (csos). But how the rights-based conception of hiv/aids and the international legitimation of csos play out at the local level depends not only on the vertical coordination between global and local levels but also on government-cso relations and the understanding of the pandemic in individual countries. South Africa and Cambodia provide comparative examples of 'glocalised' responses to hiv/aids. Both countries were among the hardest hit in their respective regions. But, while the South African government was slow to acknowledge the severity of epidemic, the Cambodian leadership quickly initiated a comprehensive response to it. The two cases illustrate how opportunity structures at the international and national levels created different local responses to hiv/aids, with significant consequences for the epidemic over time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
117937
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN A PUBLIC AND A PRIVATE SPHERE IS ESSENTIAL TO
politics. The public sphere is commonly associated with the state and politics whereas the private sphere encompasses markets and civil society.
Political power and state sovereignty rest on "a set of institutionalized
authority claims."
1
The sovereign state's authority claim over its population
imparts it with metapolitical authority. That is, the governing bodies of
states claim to have, and are recognized as having, the authority to define
what is public (and thus political) and what is private (and thus beyond
political authority).
2
The range of activities over which political bodies can
legitimately exercise authority may vary over time and between states. For
instance, the authority claims of modern welfare states are far more extensive than those of medieval or nineteenth-century states, asformerly private
aspects of people's lives have become included in the public realm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
137632
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Negotiation can be seen as a dynamic social process. Perspectives emphasizing the social context and dynamics of negotiations have been largely neglected in the negotiation literature. This article addresses the question of why social relations have received such scant attention, reviews the existing literature on negotiation as a social process, and spells out some ingredients of a social contextual approach. Finally, by way of illustration, such an approach is applied to international negotiations. Whereas ideas about social dynamics emanate from a focus on individuals, international negotiations take place at a level of aggregation and representation most remote from the individual level. Yet, even at this macro level, social context matters in negotiations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
038157
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Frances Pinter (Publishers), 1984.
|
| Description |
viii, 248p
|
| Standard Number |
0861873777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 023197 | 327.47073/JON 023197 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|