|
|
|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
005221
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, PAntheon books, 1993.
|
| Description |
xxxvii, 509p.
|
| Standard Number |
0679421491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 036265 | 327.7291/BLI 036265 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
169206
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Policy-makers, scholars, and commentators regularly remark upon the unrealized potential of Canada–Japan cooperation, but neither country has taken decisive steps to address it. This reticence is especially noticeable in the security realm. As friendly, like-minded countries with common values, a common vision of international order, and strongly shared security interests in an increasingly tumultuous world, Canada and Japan would be expected to strengthen security ties in meaningful ways. Recent (relatively minor) steps in this direction are welcome. But the time is ripe for the two countries to cement their security partnership through a series of bolder measures ultimately leading to formal alliance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
048834
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
|
| Description |
xvi, 335p.
|
| Series |
Cambridge studies in international relations; no.29
|
| Standard Number |
0521558689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 039484 | 355.02/WEL 039484 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
135244
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Modern empirical social science is unique in denying, dismissing, or discounting the role of justice considerations in human behavior. A relatively small group of International Relations (ir) scholars have attempted to address this lacuna, with limited uptake to date. The articles in this issue collectively seek to move this research program forward. In this essay, I explore various conceptual, epistemological, methodological, and sociology-of-the-field issues that may be responsible for its limited traction thus far and argue that only the last represents a serious obstacle. Whether recent trends and developments in ir indicate that the time may finally be ripe for a robust normal science on the role of justice considerations in international politics remains to be seen, but negotiation theorists are in the best position to move it forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
065879
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2005.
|
| Description |
xii, 275p.
|
| Standard Number |
0691123403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050178 | 327.101/WEL 050178 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
008344
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Summer 1995.
|
| Description |
811-850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
064708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|