Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
020146
|
|
|
Publication |
Autumn 2001.
|
Description |
109-121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
006951
|
|
|
Publication |
Summer 2000.
|
Description |
79-85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
122673
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The airspace of the combat zone is a crucial part of the battlespace and is used by all components of the joint and multinational forces. A high con- centration of friendly surface, sub- surface, and air-launched weaponsystems must share this airspace without unnecessarily hindering the application of combat power.
The primary goal of combat zone airspace control is to enhance the combat effectiveness of the joint force. Airspace control includes coordinating, integrating, and regulating airspace to increase
operational effectiveness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
021437
|
|
|
Publication |
May 2002.
|
Description |
23-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
021340
|
|
|
Publication |
March 2002.
|
Description |
16-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
052472
|
|
|
Publication |
Dec 2003.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Since the end of the 1990s, the United States is spending an enormous amount of time, money and energy in developing a workable missile defence system. The Bush administration plans to deploy a couple of missile interceptors in Alaska and California before September 2004. This article assesses different US missile defence scenarios, using four criteria: technological feasibility, cost, threat perception, and strategic stability. Based on these four criteria, we conclude that only a limited US NMD system that is not easily expandable will be acceptable for the other global actors, including Russia, China and Europe. It also requires a multilateral anti-ballistic missile treaty that sets limits to missile defence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
122662
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The current generation of ballistic missile defence (BMD) system is intended to defence Europe against rogue state threats expected in the near future- launched missile threats from the Middle East, most notable Iran and the protect the US from medium and long range missiles from North Korea and other nascent WMD wielding states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
019524
|
|
|
Publication |
April-June 2001.
|
Description |
37-42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
022515
|
|
|
Publication |
Sept 2002.
|
Description |
261-270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
007937
|
|
|
Publication |
Oct 1995.
|
Description |
36-39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
012739
|
|
|
Publication |
April 1997.
|
Description |
157-161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
011961
|
|
|
Publication |
Spring 1997.
|
Description |
7-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
054473
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
012741
|
|
|
Publication |
July 1997.
|
Description |
222-226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
020030
|
|
|
Publication |
Sept 2001.
|
Description |
737-752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
058203
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
017710
|
|
|
Publication |
Oct 2000.
|
Description |
38-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
050354
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
009349
|
|
|
Publication |
July-Sept 1995.
|
Description |
237-253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
007329
|
|
|
Publication |
June 1994.
|
Description |
31-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|