| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
181621
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
186140
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Given various intriguing intersections between geopolitical, geoeconomic, geostrategic, and geo-ecological trends, the Eastern Indian Ocean --especially the Bay of Bengal and its immediate maritime neighbourhood-- will no doubt retain its salience on the vibrant reserach agenda of Indian Ocean and Indo-Pacific studies. For reasons no less compelling, the Western Indian Ocean also demands and deserves serious engagement by both academia and policy makers. A bi-focal approach centered on the subcontinent, and one that is mindful of this intersectionality, is needed to ensure a holistic understanding of the vast and diverse Indian Ocean region; a region of interlinked yet distinct sub-regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
079377
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, John Agnew, 2007.
|
| Description |
xii, 176p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415348021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:1,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location | IssuedTo | DueOn |
| 052689 | 320.12/BIA 052689 | Main | Issued | General | | RF024 | 10-Aug-2023 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
011425
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1996.
|
| Description |
1-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
079931
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article offers a critical re-examination of the concept of world order. Taking our cue from Georg Sørensen's recent article in this journal entitled `What Kind of World Order?' we begin by unpacking the concept of order itself. We distinguish two principal meanings of the term: one analytical and descriptive (order as non-randomness) and one value-laden and normative (order as stability and the absence of violent conflict). In debates about world order, these two meanings are often blurred. Drawing on William Connolly's critique of the descriptive-normative distinction, we suggest that this blurring occurs in part because world order is an `essentially contested concept'. Practices of ordering typically involve the production of specific spatializations, yet questions of space and spatiality are largely absent from discussions of world order. In the second part of the article, therefore, we address this absence through a discussion of geo-politics, focusing on US hegemony and neo-liberalism, military geographies and the spaces of marginalization and resistance. The article concludes with some reflections on the political implications of a spatialized account of world order
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|