|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
193056
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article explores shortcomings in military effectiveness in the war in Afghanistan. It focuses on three sets of problems: the failure to resolve internal contradictions in the training effort, the failure to integrate political considerations with military activity, and poor strategic and operational/tactical integration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
000830
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Brassey, 1999.
|
Description |
xx,392p.
|
Standard Number |
185753297X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
042218 | R 355.405/BRA 042218 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
006746
|
|
|
Publication |
Roma, Centre For higher Defense Studies,
|
Description |
376p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
038553 | 355.4/COL 038553 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
098464
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article examines how external third parties, particularly international organizations, can facilitate the development of security community and international integration within post-conflict societies. Focusing on seven countries in the Western Balkan region, this study offers unique insight into how and why feelings of trust and a sense of community can be encouraged by external actors - the EU and NATO in this case - and how and if trust and community can filter down to the most local levels within post-conflict societies. Ultimately, we argue that both the EU and NATO have, primarily through membership requirements to engage in regional interaction and cooperation, significantly contributed to the development of security community among Western Balkan neighbors at the elite level. However, we also find that feelings of trust and belongingness are still very much lacking among the general population of the Western Balkan region. Such insights will further efforts to enhance conflict resolution and post-conflict reconstruction in the Western Balkans and elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
075198
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Lancer Publishers and Distributors, 2006.
|
Description |
xxxi, 188p.
|
Standard Number |
8170621240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
051928 | 355.0310954/MAL 051928 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
070736
|
|
|
Publication |
Santa Monica, Rand Corporation, 1996.
|
Description |
xxxi, 287p.
|
Standard Number |
0833023578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
038193 | 355.031091821/KUG 038193 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
109101
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The present study discusses the evolution of threat perception in the area of national security by the analysis of successive strategic documents of the Republic of Poland. After a brief discussion of terms related to security, it goes on to present how the perception of threat changed over the years 1989-2007. It emphasizes that the source of this evolution was Poland's changing internal and external environment. As the article points out, the originally major threat of immediate armed invasion of Poland virtually no longer exists, due to Poland's membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU). Instead, new threats have emerged with the transnational ones being the most serious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
070553
|
|
|
Publication |
Santa Monica, Rand Corporation, 1988.
|
Description |
xxi, 190p.
|
Standard Number |
0833008854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
029882 | 355.031091821/LEV 029882 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
029809
|
|
|
Publication |
Hampshire, macmillan Press, 1985.
|
Description |
xii, 302p.hbk
|
Series |
RUSI Defence Studies Series; 1
|
Standard Number |
0333370600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
026672 | 960.32/COK 026672 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
071336
|
|
|
Publication |
Santa Monica, Rand Corporation, 1999.
|
Description |
15p.
|
Standard Number |
0833027751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
042307 | 355.031091821/CHU 042307 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
114215
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Few issues are more important to scholars of Europe's emergence as a foreign policy actor than whether the European Union (EU) can forge a common defense-industrial policy out of 27 states' procurement policies and defense industries. Overlooked in most scholarly analyses of European defense-industrial cooperation, the story of Europe's international armaments organizations stretches back more than six decades. In this article, we examine the impact of past institutional outcomes on the defense-industrial field by applying the concepts and analytic tools of historic institutionalism to European armaments organizations. Because past institutional dynamics have channeled the subsequent development of armaments cooperation, what has emerged is a polycentric governance architecture wherein organizations with transatlantic, pan-European and restrictive-European memberships dominate distinct components of the cooperative process. We demonstrate that this maturing institutional pattern will likely limit the opportunities for the EU - and especially its Commission - to shape the future contours of European defense-industrial cooperation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
024424
|
|
|
Publication |
New York, Basic Books, 1968.
|
Description |
xxii, 221p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
006049 | 327.73/BEI 006049 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
122533
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Envisioning the soldier of the future as part of a larger transformation is currently taking place among the members of the NATO alliance. Faced with new threats and challenges, global infantry forces are redesigning themselves as lighter, faster and more agile formations that can be deployed rapidly and effectively, with small units asymmetrically fielding combat capabilities that would exceed those of the present by several orders of magnitude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
151309
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The U.S. sale of Trident submarine-launched ballistic missile technology to Britain in 1982 resolved doubts that had emerged in the 1970s about the importance, durability, and strength of the Anglo-American nuclear partnership. But the Trident Sales Agreement did more than bring the “special relationship” out of the doldrums. It became an integral part of an Anglo-American agenda that bolstered North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) unity in the face of Soviet efforts to undermine the alliance’s nuclear objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
167457
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Norway, Sweden and Finland have proclaimed a willingness to cooperate militarily in a future crisis or conflict despite their diverging alliance affiliation. This article assesses their ability to do so through various elements affecting their interoperability, with Arctic Challenge, a multinational military exercise, as an empirical basis. The analysis finds that the NATO/non-NATO-divide has a negative impact on the trilateral defence cooperation, especially on exchange of information and aspects related to command and control. At the same time, Finland and Sweden have become largely NATO-standardized through their active partnership with the Alliance. This has affected interoperability aspects, such as communication, culture, and the compatibility of technical solutions, in a positive manner. Through agreements with the Alliance, as well as domestic legal changes, the two NATO-partners have facilitated receiving military assistance from Norway and other NATO-members during a crisis. Other agreements between the Nordic countries, however, have been limited to peacetime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
146853
|
|
|
Contents |
Nations from the developed world have rarely participated in complex and difficult UN peacekeeping operations (PKOs) while those from the developing world have rich peacekeeping experience. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) is a rare exception among peacekeeping missions as it includes peacekeepers from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), along with Western military involvement. NATO members’ involvement in UNIFIL resulted in unusual structures and operational philosophy, and adjusting and adapting to this was difficult for non-Western participants. Despite the differences in training, equipment, culture and tradition amongst the Western and non-Western national contingents, UNIFIL’s contribution in maintaining peace in the region is praiseworthy. The combined effects of the political and military muscles of peacekeepers from Western nations and special skills of the non-Western nations was able to provide much-needed stability to Lebanon, which has not seen a major conflict in almost a decade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
031576
|
|
|
Publication |
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1990.
|
Description |
vi, 266p.
|
Standard Number |
1555871593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
032124 | 355.031091821/LUC 032124 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|