| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
061429
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May-Jun 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
141127
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea and aggression against Ukraine, members of NATO are again pondering the strength of Western deterrence. Over the course of the Ukraine crisis, President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly emphasised the potency of Russian nuclear weapons, announced new nuclear-weapons programmes and brushed off accusations that Russia is cheating on a number of arms-control agreements. Most ominously, Putin has declared that he would have been prepared to place Russian nuclear forces on alert – which implies threatening their use – had the annexation of Crimea met with serious resistance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
088478
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
At first glance, Europe's discord over the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a foreign policy debacle. And when a majority of Member States publicly broke ranks with a tenuously reached common position, skeptics argued that the EU's consultative and consensus-based process of foreign policy making was either fictitious or irrevocably broken. But in fact, the Iraq crisis triggered a normative reframing of security and defense policy and renewed a commitment to consensus decision making. Rather than a lowest common denominator outcome, a compromise position was reached in the form of EU-coordinated economic and humanitarian assistance to rebuilding Iraq that has exceeded 200 million euros per year since 2004. This was possible because normative commitments to develop the EU as a global actor and to promote democracy and the rule of law worldwide legitimated EU action and constrained Member States with 'do nothing' and/or 'let the UN do it' preferences. The foreign ministers' ability to reach agreement on coordinated recon aid to Iraq also displays the Union's principled commitment to make decisions in a norm-governed and consensus-based institutional environment of cooperative bargaining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
066872
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
083614
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
138712
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oxon, Routledge, 2014.
|
| Description |
159p.Pbk
|
| Series |
Adelphi Paper No.446
|
| Standard Number |
9781138907140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058206 | 355.8251190951/LEW 058206 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
093227
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
156302
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In summer 2013, the Syrian regime launched a large-scale chemical-weapons attack against its own people in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, an event that left many people dead, disturbed France–US relations and reverberated around the world with potentially profound consequences for deterrence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
074597
|
|
|