|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
095206
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The 18th International Academic Conference "China, Chinese Civilization and the World: History, the Present, Prospects" was held in Moscow at the RAS Presidium and the Institute for Far Eastern Studies. It was timed to two major historical events: the 60th anniversary of the formation of the PRC and the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the U.S.S.R./RF and the PRC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
111858
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The conference, which is traditionally organized and held by the RAS Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Scientific Council on the Problems of Comprehensive Study of Modern China and Russian-Chinese Friendship Society in Moscow was attended by about 200 scholars, lecturers, postgraduate students and students from the Russian Federation and eight foreign countries: the PRC (including Hong Kong and Macao), Belgium, Iceland, France, the United States, the Republic of Taiwan, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. They represented ten Russian and foreign research institutions, as well as 34 Russian and foreign universities and institutes. The conference drew much attention of the mass media, for example journalists from the newspaper Izvestia, Russian Information Agency Novosti and Chinese Xinhua News Agency. Diplomats from the PRC Embassy to Russia were also present at the conference. Officials of a number of ministries, departments and the Department of External Church Relations of the Russian Orthodox Church also displayed interest in the event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
025284
|
|
|
Publication |
Berkeley, University of California Press, 1968.
|
Description |
157p.Hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
002831 | 931/GER 002831 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
091610
|
|
|
Edition |
11th Rev ed.
|
Publication |
Berkeley, Diablo Press, 1998.
|
Description |
ix, 252p.pbk
|
Standard Number |
0872970019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
054467 | 951/WAR 054467 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
082798
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyzes discussions, resources, and prospects for soft power in China, focusing on the Beijing Consensus, foreign policy, and civilization. It posits that the country's recognition of soft power and its application to national policies is an important factor in explaining China's rapidly increasing influence in Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
061762
|
|
|
Publication |
Apr-Jun 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
153485
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The time is ripe for delving into how civilizations are getting along and keeping in touch with each other in the global era. In looking for the causes of multiplying conflicts it is not enough to point to global economic and geopolitical contradictions alone. The civilizational aspect is crucial as well. It aroused particularly keen interest in the last quarter of the twentieth century. In Russia, this interest stemmed largely from the need to refurbish the less attractive theory of social formations or replace it with something more relevant. Samuel Huntington's article (subsequently a book) played a big role in invigorating the civilizational discourse. His initiative induced the emergence of quite a few meaningful works on the problems of civilizations in many countries, including Russia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
141450
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
How will China influence world politics in the twenty-first century? Many people answer this question by looking to Chinese history, and particularly to traditional models of Chinese world order. This essay seeks to complicate this question by asking which history, and which tradition? While it is common to look at China's pre-modern history as ‘tradition’, this essay argues that we also need to appreciate how ‘socialism’ is treated as a tradition alongside Chinese civilization. It does this by examining how China's public intellectuals appeal to two seemingly odd sources: Mao Zedong's 1956 speech ‘Strengthen Party Unity and Carry Forward Party Traditions’, and the ‘Great Harmony’ passage from the two millennia-old Book of Rites. It will argue that these two passages are employed as a way of salvaging socialism; the ideological transition thus is not from communism to nationalism, but to a curious combination of socialism and Chinese civilization. This new socialist/civilization dynamic integrates equality and hierarchy into a new form of statism, which is involved in a global competition of social models. Or to put it another way, what these two passages have in common is not necessarily a positive ideal, but a common enemy: liberalism, the West and the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
140660
|
|
|
Edition |
2nd rev. ed.
|
Publication |
Tokyo, Charles E Tuttle Company, 1954.
|
Description |
xi + xi, 292p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
012065 | 952/REI 012065 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
183453
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The creation of an alphabet and system of spelling for the Chinese language [Standard Beijing (Northern) Mandarin/Putong -hua] (the Pinyin Zimu Project) gave new life to ancient Chinese characters. In 1958, the "Great Mute," the Chinese character, began speaking to the world for the first time with the sounds of Beijing speech. Today the two forms of Chinese Mandarin writing, traditional ideographic and innovative phonographic, together ensure the linguo-cultural unity of Chinese society and the progress of science and technology in China. Millions of people in China and beyond are studying the Chinese language based on the phonetic standard of words in Putonghua. The use of letters to spell Chinese words ensures tele- and Internet communication for hundreds of millions of Chinese. In the 20th century, the first Latinized alphabet for the Chinese language was created under the influence of the experience of creating alphabets for nonliterate peoples of the USSR in 1921-1926. One of the founders and leaders of the CPC, Qu Qiubai (officially listed in the 100 Greatest Figures of New China), played a leading role in this project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|