Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
062577
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
114721
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
190876
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
079206
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
130108
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
119372
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
121142
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
108188
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, IDSA, 2011.
|
Description |
36p.
|
Series |
IDSA occasional paper no. 21
|
Standard Number |
979816019961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
056308 | 355.00954/GAU 056308 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
056309 | 355.00954/GAU 056309 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
103292
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The US and British armies have faced intelligent and adaptive enemies in Iraq and continue to do so in Afghanistan. While both armies have proved adept at fighting high-intensity conflict, their initial performance against asymmetric threats and diffuse insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrated how much each army had to learn about conducting counterinsurgency operations. This article examines one important means by which the US and British armies have transformed themselves into more flexible and responsive organizations that are able to harness innovation at the front effectively. It traces the development of the lessons-learned systems in both armies from the start of counterinsurgency operations in Iraq to today. These changes have resulted in significant development within the organization of both armies. Reform of US and British army learning capabilities offers an important insight into the drivers of military change. The reformed lessons-learned systems have been better integrated into training, experimentation, and doctrine and force development. While there are still challenges to be overcome, both armies have created robust structures that facilitate the movement of knowledge from recent experience at the front to the rest of the organization. As such, these reforms provide us with a useful case-study that enhances our understanding of the role of 'bottom-up' initiatives in military innovation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
125297
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Water seems an unlikely cause of war, but many commentators believe it could define 21st Century conflict. A February 2013 article in U.S. News and World Report warns that "the water-war surprises will come", and laments that "traditional statesmanship will only take us so far in heading off water wars". A 2012 article in Al Jazeera notes that "strategists from Israel to Central Asia" are preparing for strife caused by water conflict. Even the United States National Intelligence Estimate predicts wars over water within ten years. Their concern is understandable--humanity needs fresh water to live, but a rise in population coupled with a fall in available resources would seem to be a perfect catalyst for conflict. This thinking, although intuitively appealing, has little basis in reality--humans have contested water supplies for ages, but disputes over water tend to be resolved via cooperation, rather than conflict. Water conflict, rather than being a disturbing future source of conflict, is instead a study in the prevention of conflict through negotiation and agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
113339
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
038959
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Bodley Head Ltd, 1968.
|
Description |
316p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
370004116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
001472 | 953.3/SCH 001472 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|