| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
108514
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The debate on peacebuilding is deadlocked. Leading scholars of 'fourth generation' peacebuilding, who take Liberalism to task for creating what they refer to as crises in peacebuilding, have themselves been challenged by those they criticise for over-stating Liberal failure and failing themselves to produce the goods in terms of an alternative. But behind this debate, it seems that both approaches are asking the same question: how can stable, legitimate, sustainable peace be engineered? This article engages critical theory with problem-solving social sciences. It proposes that the crises in orthodox post-conflict peacebuilding are genuine, but there are approaches that might put flesh on fourth generation concepts without bringing the Liberal edifice down, shifting the debate away from ontology and ideology and returning it to the people in whose name it is held.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
044247
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Croom Helm, 1987.
|
| Description |
182p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 027561 | 322.42095691/ROB 027561 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
071582
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
081135
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Zed Books, 2008.
|
| Description |
ix, 208p.
|
| Standard Number |
9781842778258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 053247 | 362.8292/ROB 053247 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
106778
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Post-conflict peacebuilding is failing, according to both its critics and its advocates. By way of solutions, proponents seek more of the same, whereas opponents argue for a radical shift. Both contain parts of a possible solution to the lack of local legitimacy that stigmatizes interventions, many of which descend into violence within five years and few of which produce democracies. This article advances the idea of a 'popular peace' that refocuses liberal institution-building upon local, democratically determined priorities deriving from 'everyday lives', in addition to internationally favoured preferences (such as metropolitan courts and bureaucratic government). This is hypothesized to better confront the prevailing legitimacy lacuna, create social institutions around which a contract can evolve and generate the foundations upon which durable peacebuilding may grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
134585
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Qatar has been one of the most active states during the Arab Spring. It has broadly supported the uprisings with media coverage on Al Jazeera, the Doha-based news channel, as well as with financial, diplomatic and material support for protagonists. Often Qatar threw its support behind Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood to the extent that some kind of direct, intimate relationship was assumed to exist between the two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|