Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
062978
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
019513
|
|
|
Publication |
2001.
|
Description |
214-234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
106930
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This paper explores the nature, background, and evolution of the "Camp David consensus." Under this consensus, Egyptian intellectuals and political movements broadly accept that the Egyptian regime must deal constructively and "correctly" with Israel as a state, but insist that society has the right and responsibility to resist Zionism. The consensus rests on particular ways of understanding Israel, and the nature of the Arab-Israeli conflict, that can be traced back to the formative years of the Egyptian republic under Nasser. This has served the interests of both regimes and opposition movements and in this sense represents a "double instrumentalization" of foreign policy. The paper, which examines a range of regime and intellectual pronouncements during the Nasser and Sadat periods, as well as more recently, challenges the growing use within International Relations, particularly in the Middle East context, of the concept of "identity" to explain state behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
116186
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article examines the major developments that have taken place since the signing of the Oslo accords in September 1993. It analyses the major mistakes made along the way by both sides, showing that brinkmanship is a very dangerous policy when one or both sides are willing to pay a high price in blood. Finally, it offers a blueprint for breaking the deadlock roughly based on the Clinton parameters of 2001 and the subsequent Israeli-Palestinian Geneva Accords.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
167161
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article records my interview with Professor Ambassador Itamar Rabinovich. We discussed the keys for successful peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians; the differences between Camp David 1978 and Camp David 2000; The Oslo Accords; the role of the United States as a mediator and the potential of other countries to become mediators; the viability of a two-state solution; peace with Syria; Taba; Annapolis; the Israeli evacuation of Gaza, and the rise of Hamas. The interview assesses the positive and negative lessons and implications of the peace process, and the likelihood of bringing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to a close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
182897
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Israeli PM Ehud Olmert (2006–9) offered the Palestinians the most comprehensive peace deal they had ever received. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said he would reply ‘soon’ and never did. This interview records Olmert’s thoughts on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process and his own attempts to end the bitter conflict.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
027412
|
|
|
Publication |
Boulder, Westview Press Inc., 1984.
|
Description |
xv, 263p.hbk
|
Series |
Westview Special Studies on the Middle East
|
Standard Number |
0865316570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
024721 | 956.05/FRE 024721 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|