| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
065579
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2000.
|
| Description |
p.29-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
129711
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
144936
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The authors offer a comparative analysis of the approaches taken in Russia (U.S.S.R.) and the United States to the deployment of their strategic antiballistic missile defense systems, and survey the major stages of ABM system development. They show the influence the U.S. military doctrine has exercised on the formation of the country's ABM defense and its intention to take advantage of the new world order to use its ABM system for a different purpose instead - delivering a first nuclear missile strike with impunity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
020064
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
p61-94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
111975
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
183420
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper analyzes the dynamics of cooperation be-
tween Russia and the United States with respect to crises in antimissile
defense (AMD) at various stages of AMD systems creation. It exam-
ines likely trends in Russia-US cooperation in this area under pres-
ent-day conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
066572
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
182633
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The chapter examines the driving forces and the institutions behind the Russian military buildup in the period between 2010 and 2020. The beginning of the rapid Russian military modernization in late 2000s was the result of the shifting threat assesments by the Russian political leadership and the painful lessons of the war with Georgia in 2008. Russia had to conduct an throughout and painful restructuring of the military institutions and the defense industrial complex in order to be able to meet the ambitious goals of its’ rearmament program. The result was significant growth in the Russian military capabilities by the middle of the decade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
169710
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Arms control is going through a very difficult period. The 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty is gone, the 1990 Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty is basically dead, the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran is in tatters, the future of the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) is in doubt, it appears possible the United States will withdraw from the 1992 Open Skies Treaty, and there are concerns over whether damage will be done to the 1968 nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty at its review conference next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
100705
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2010.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
RONALD REAGAN'S SIGNATURE PHRASE "Trust but Verify" surfaced every time the arms reduction talks were discussed in the United States. The "insidious" Russians, meanwhile, opted for "Verify Before Trusting" when dealing with the Americans, the formula suggested by the sad experience of America's unilateral withdrawal from the ABM Treaty and the extreme vagueness of Washington's strategic aims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
088089
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1987.
|
| Description |
x, 117p.
|
| Standard Number |
0815730497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 035504 | 341.738/GAR 035504 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
002070
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1988.
|
| Description |
11p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 033030 | 358.174/GRA 033030 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 034622 | 358.174/GRA 034622 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
022787
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2002.
|
| Description |
89-96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
130419
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Sino-Russian relations have swayed considerably in the second millennium. During the Yeltsin era, China-Russia relations were still strong, but this changed abruptly after Putin's accession to the presidency in 2000 and his initial pro-Western adventures. This was, in no small part, due to Russia's involvement in the war on terror, together with Russia's complicity in a US military presence in Central Asia which did not go down well in Beijing. Putin's domestic constituency found his swing into Washington's fold equally awkward, which created no small amount of criticism in Russia. Convinced that things could not get much worse, Putin's acceptance of NATO's expansion into the Baltics, his approval of US withdrawal from the ABM-treaty, and his quiet consent for an American military presence in Georgia raised additional fears in the Duma, within Russian public opinion, and to some extent among the Chinese. This was perceived as a direct surrender to American superiority and aggression, and it would not last for long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|