Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:388
Hits:19945850
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
MALKA, HAIM
(3)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
065208
Forcing choices: testing the transformation of Hamas
/ Malka, Haim
Autumn 2005
Malka, Haim
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
Autumn 2005.
Key Words
Palestine
;
PLO
;
United States
;
Middle East
;
Hamas
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
082479
Hamas and the two-state solution
/ Zuhur, Sherifa; Abunimah, Ali; Malka, Haim; Telhami, Shibley
Telhami, Shibley
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2008.
Key Words
PLO
;
Middle East
;
Hamas
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
3
ID:
116607
Shifting eastern mediterranean geometry
/ Alterman, Jon B; Malka, Haim
Malka, Haim
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2012.
Summary/Abstract
The security architecture that the United States helped establish after the Cold War in the Eastern Mediterranean is crumbling. That architecture emphasized two triangular partnerships: U.S.-Turkey-Israel and U.S.-Egypt-Israel. Each had its origin in the Cold War and gained new emphasis afterwards as a cornerstone of U.S. efforts to promote Middle Eastern stability. Yet the evolution of internal politics in Turkey over the last decade, combined with more recent shifts in Egypt, have brought to the fore civilian politicians who are openly critical of such partnerships and who have sidelined the partnerships' military proponents. The demise of these two triangles has profound implications for Israeli security, as well as for the U.S. military and diplomatic role in the Eastern Mediterranean. The changing geometry of U.S. relationships in the Eastern Mediterranean is part of a set of broader trends that make it more difficult for the United States to shape outcomes and set agendas in the region. This change in particular is likely to force the United States to emphasize bilateral relationships and ad hoc direct action in the future, placing a greater demand on ongoing U.S. management than has been the case in the past.
Key Words
Israel
;
United States
;
Middle East Policy
;
Gulf War - 1991
;
Eastern Mediterranean
;
US - Turkey - Israel
;
US - Egypt - Israel
;
Geometry
;
Turkish - Israeli Partnership
;
US – Turkey – Israel
;
US – Egypt – Israel
;
Cold War
;
Internal Politics
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export