| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
091339
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Bantam Book, 2009.
|
| Description |
334p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780553805390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 054390 | 355.033073/KRE 054390 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
100571
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Iran's acquisition of a nuclear bomb would upend the Middle East. It is unclear how a nuclear-armed Iran would weigh the costs, benefits, and risks of brinkmanship, meaning that it could be difficult to deter Tehran from attacking the United States' interests or partners in the region.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
065404
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Sep-Oct 2005.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Because they lack a coherent strategy, U.S. forces in Iraq have failed to defeat the insurgency or improve security. Winning will require a new approach to counterinsurgency, one that focuses on providing security to Iraqis rather than hunting down insurgents. And it will take at least a decade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
085521
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
President Obama's decision to appoint a bipartisan natioanl security team comprising experienced individuals from the moderate middle of the political spectrum has led some observers to harken back to the Eisenhower administrations's more successful arrangements for developing national strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
186885
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
193243
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Haven, Yale University Press, 2023.
|
| Description |
xvi, 549p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780300234091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 060481 | 623.45/KRE 060481 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
089081
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The military foundations of the United States' global dominance are eroding. For the past several decades, an overwhelming advantage in technology and resources has given the U.S. military an unmatched ability to project power worldwide. This has allowed it to guarantee U.S. access to the global commons, assure the safety of the homeland, and underwrite security commitments around the globe. U.S. grand strategy assumes that such advantages will continue indefinitely. In fact, they are already starting to disappear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
116117
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Over the next decade, the U.S. military will need to undertake the most dramatic shift in its strategy since the introduction of nuclear weapons more than 60 years ago. Just as defense budgets are declining, the price of projecting and sustaining military power is increasing and the range of interests requiring protection is expanding. This means that tough strategic choices will finally have to be made, not just talked about. As the British physicist Ernest Rutherford once declared to his colleagues, "We haven't got the money, so we've got to think."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|