| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
177914
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The global health emergency and the economic crisis it unleashed cried out for international policy coordination. The response was underwhelming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
066037
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
176521
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Should Germany or Japan become more like ‘normal’ great powers, this would undermine, rather than strengthen, international peace and stability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
041434
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Paris, The Atlantic Institute for International Affairs, 1981.
|
| Description |
60p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 020023 | 333.79/MAU 020023 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
164538
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The erosion of the international order seems rooted in a decline in the resilience of states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
072677
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2006.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The international order is becoming increasingly precarious as a result of the pressures of globalisation and inadequate policy responses by many states, most importantly the United States, which still holds a pivotal role in building and sustaining international order. The present state of affairs in global governance is characterised by 1) an overwhelming concentration of power at the level of interstate relations but 2) a diffusion of power if we look at the totality of international relations, 3) the erosion of state authority and political legitimacy, 4) the growing importance of markets and of 5) fundamentalist ideologies, 6) the declining utility and the paradoxical impact of force on political order, and 7) by the still indispensable but increasingly fragile base of international order in functioning statehood at the national level. Overall, this situation reflects a mismatch between political demands on and the actual supply of international order whose present state leaves much to be desired. By way of conclusion, the article offers some policy recommendations about how to change the present precarious situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
040993
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Macmillan, 1984.
|
| Description |
xvii, 413p.
|
| Series |
Studies in International security
|
| Standard Number |
0333371518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 027519 | 333.8233/MAU 027519 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
025725
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Macmillan Press Ltd., 1984.
|
| Description |
xvii 413p.
|
| Standard Number |
0333371518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 029982 | 339.4/MAV 029982 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
147924
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In her interview with The International Spectator, Nathalie Tocci describes Federica Mogherini’s assessment of the present state of the European Union as “extremely sobering”. This in my view gets it exactly right: these are “make or break” days for the EU as we know it. Yet, sadly, I am sceptical whether the EU Global Strategy can help to overcome that existential crisis. In fact, I rather fear that it might make things worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
067119
|
|
|