| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
157478
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The Philippines and Japan have evolved a security partnership in the face of China's maritime expansion in the South and East China Seas. The two countries pursue this security partnership through regular bilateral consultations among Philippine and Japanese heads of states, political leaders, defense ministry officials, and high-ranking military officers; joint naval exercises; and exploratory discussions for arms transfers and negotiations for a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between Japan and the Philippines. Initially, Article 9 of Japan's 1947 Constitution hindered this security partnership. However, a recent reinterpretation of the pacifist constitution now allows Japan a collective self-defense “particularly to export arms to its allies and security partners and to deploy the JSDF overseas when necessary. Now, the challenge for Japan and the Philippines is to ensure the viability of their security partnership in the light of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte's efforts to improve his country's relations with China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
177932
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
On the eve of its foundation in 1954, the Republic of Vietnam had five motorised fishing boats; 20 years later, that figure had swelled to over sixty thousand. This conversion to fossil fuels, along with associated developments like the intensified exploitation of marine ecologies and the use of new synthetic materials, form part of what has come to be called the ‘Great Acceleration’. This article follows a Japanese fisheries expert who spent six years in Vietnam in the early 1960s to explore the physical and conceptual work this process entailed, its entanglement with projects of war-making and nation-building, and the way it was both a product of and producer of the collapse of local ecologies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
130159
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
119368
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
146562
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
144614
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Transparency has long been a rare commodity in international affairs. But today, the forces of technology are ushering in a new age of openness that would have been unthinkable just a few decades ago. Governments, journalists, and nongovernmental organ¬izations (NGOs) can now harness a flood of open-source information, drawn from commercial surveillance satellites, drones, smartphones, and computers, to reveal hidden activities in contested areas—from Ukraine to Syria to the South China Sea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
129521
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
110049
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article analyzes the contradictions in the region of the South China Sea, which have exacerbated recently. The peak of tension was in the first half of 2011, when quite a few serious incidents between China and the Philippines and China and Vietnam took place in the area. The situation becomes more complicated due to the sudden activity of Washington which comes out for the freedom of navigation and wishes to participate in the settlement of conflicts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
111276
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
162176
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
137365
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Based on an original survey conducted in the summer of 2012 in Beijing, we examine how China's America watchers—IR scholars who work on US-China relations—have viewed China's power status in the international system, US-China relations and some specific US policies in Asia. Our survey shows that almost half of the survey participants thought that America would remain the global hegemon in the next ten years. Meanwhile, a large majority was also optimistic that China is a rising great power, especially in the economic sense, in the world. More than half of the respondents saw Asian military issues, such as the South China Sea issue, as the most difficult problem between China and the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
146436
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A major Chinese narrative regarding the South China Sea is one of unreciprocated restraint. But Chinese leaders have clearly had an ambitious long-term vision of some sort, backed by years of efforts, themselves based on long-standing claims encapsulated in an ambiguous “nine-dash line” enclosing virtually all of the South China Sea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
102585
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Opposing American and Chinese views on navigational rights of warships in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) reached a climax in 2009 with a number of incidents. Developments in 2010 indicate that the general climate between the two States in the South China Sea has not improved. By focusing on navigational rights of warships in the EEZ as well as in the territorial sea, the present contribution highlights some salient features of the relevant ocean policies of both States, some of which seem hard to square with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. After having noted that these opposing positions of China and the United States concerning navigational rights of warships are hard to reconcile at present, the article looks for possible solutions as to the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
109521
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
130843
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article examines U.S. foreign relations with Southeast Asia. An increase in U.S. involvement in the region under the administration of President Barack Obama is considered. A contradiction in U.S. policy is said to exist between insistence by the administration that its desire for stability and freedom of the seas in Southeast Asia is not intended as containment of China and China's aggressive maritime boundary claims in the South China Sea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
156041
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
134400
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2015.
|
| Description |
xii, 212p.Hbk
|
| Contents |
In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
|
| Standard Number |
9788182747746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 057904 | 954.88/KAU 057904 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
| 057905 | 954.88/KAU 057905 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
069206
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
160674
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The South China Sea disputes involve both island and maritime claims among sovereign states and the issue has long been a point of debate in international politics. It involves not only the countries in dispute but also other major world powers, including the United States. Its important strategic location and the abundant resources make the South China Sea a target of contention among the claimant countries. The arbitral ruling in July 2016 gives a new momentum to the dispute. The article examines the strategic relations of China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) by analyzing the positions and steps taken by ASEAN and China, as well as ASEAN-China joint initiatives. It also discusses the challenges and viable solutions to the dispute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
009312
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1995.
|
| Description |
531-543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|