| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
019510
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May-June 2001.
|
| Description |
41-54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
007065
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Spring 2000.
|
| Description |
8-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
020608
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 2001.
|
| Description |
92-110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
019774
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2001.
|
| Description |
65-81
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Research into the causes of contemporary international conflict faces a number of conceptual limitations, which in turn limits the effectiveness of international conflict resolution efforts. Typically, today's internal conflicts are conceived of as irrational outbursts of 'ethnic' hatred, or the breakdown of normally peaceful political systems. In this paper, I argue that the causes of internal conflicts are, in fact, located in the structures of weak states and the actions of weak state elites, who may deliberately engender conflict as a rational response to the internal and external demands brought on by the intrusive processes of globalisation. In this sense, internal conflict is a 'normal' aspect of weak state politics. The weak state framework not only provides a more satisfying explanation of internal conflict, but it has profound implications for conflict resolution. It suggests that conflict resolution must be focused on state reconstruction activities, rather than on saving failing states. It also suggests that there are likely to be many more internal conflicts which demand international action in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|