| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
066289
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
070272
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
043893
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
2nd ed.
|
| Publication |
Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1982.
|
| Description |
xii, 404p. pbk
|
| Standard Number |
0253202809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 021660 | 968.06/CAR 021660 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
193105
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Why do some international rivalries last longer than others? Rivalry literature focuses on the dyadic interactions within rivalries, but most rivalries have been connected to other rivalries. This paper examines a rivalry’s overlapping immediate strategic environment focusing on the countries directly connected via rivalries or alliances. Specifically, I consider how rivals are connected to third parties as common enemies, common friends, or mixed. I focus on three mechanisms to explain the third parties’ influence on the focal rivalry. First, a rivalry is more likely to end when it has common allies (information flow) or common enemies (prioritization). Second, a rivalry with mixed third parties is more likely to endure (stable blocs). Analyses of rivalry duration show that the duration of minor-minor rivalries is more likely to be influenced by common allies and mixed third parties, while that of major-minor rivalries is more likely to be affected by common enemies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|