| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
066746
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, Pluto Press, 2005.
|
| Description |
vi, 223p.
|
| Series |
Anthropology, culture and society
|
| Standard Number |
0745323863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050388 | 306.3/MOS 050388 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
134816
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article pursues the goal of going beyond Saidian notions of Orientalism and Said's assumption of the “complicity of knowledge with power” to reach back to Foucault's initial postulations on the role of institutions and the intellectual in the interplay of power/knowledge relations. The article concentrates on the role of Russian military Oriental studies institutions and Orientologists in the context of discourses (the promotion of Russkoe Delo, the juxtaposition of Russia with the West and the Orient, etc.) that existed in late Imperial Russia and influenced the accumulation and development of scholarly knowledge on the Orient. Therefore, the significant contribution of the military domain to Russian Oriental studies on both the institutional and individual levels are examined from the angle of intra-Russian discourses in the period from the establishment of the Asiatic Section of the General Staff in 1863 up to 1917.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
185060
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The objective duality of the world and humanity should correspond to the juxtaposition of Oriental and Western studies, but science and pedagogy know only the former, i.e., Orientalism. This monopoly was a consequence of the formation of the modern system of sciences in an era of global domination by the West, which presented the East as its opposite, the non-West, and/or interpreted its relations with it in value-asymmetric categories of culture and barbarism. The publication in 2006 of the Russian translation of E. Said's famous book Orientalism and the scientific and educational reforms of 2010-2013 led to a discussion among Russian Orientalists about the meaning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|