| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
161576
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Neither the Chinese nor US economic systems will fundamentally change as a result of overt trade conflict. The challenge for policy‐relevant economics is to design a regime for China–US commerce that accepts the co‐existence but also addresses underlying disputes. Many important China–US disputes, notably those over intellectual property protection and state subsidies, cannot be resolved by the World Trade Organization, thus new institutions must be built. Economics‐based regime principles should entail recognition that: the China–US bilateral trade imbalance is unique mainly because of macroeconomic and financial factors, not trade; agreements should restrict commercial and government behaviors, not target economic outcomes; Chinese companies must compete and be allowed to succeed in any sector, including high‐technology; China is not entitled to US‐owned technology, thus intellectual property rights must be enforced; and the US Government should support an increased role for China in global economic governance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
066763
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Washington, DC, Institute For International Economics, 2005.
|
| Description |
xi, 204p.
|
| Series |
Special report 18
|
| Standard Number |
0881323748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 050395 | 332.494/POS 050395 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
158854
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the aftermath of World War II, the United States set about building a global, rules-based economic order [2]. At the heart of that order, it put the liberal values of free trade and the rule of law. Over the next seven decades, the order, backed by U.S. power and bolstered by its growing legitimacy among other countries, prevented most economic disputes from escalating into mutually destructive trade wars, let alone military conflict. That allowed even the smallest and poorest countries to develop their social and economic potential without having to worry about predation by stronger neighbors. By taking much of the fear out of the global economy, the U.S.-led order allowed market decisions to be driven by business, not bullying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
091454
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In the postwar period, US power and prestige beyond the nation's military prowess have been largely based on the relative size and success of America's economy. This strength enabled the United States to promote worldwide economic openness and encourage buying in to a set of institutions, formal and informal, that resulted in increasing international eocnomic integration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|