Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1450Hits:19151566Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
LEGISLATIVE YUAN (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   066902


How does a rubber stamp become a roaring lion? the transformati / Liao, Ta-Chi 2005  Journal Article
Liao, Ta-Chi Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2005.
        Export Export
2
ID:   130629


Measuring and explaining the electoral fortunes of small partie / Fell, Dafydd   Journal Article
Fell, Dafydd Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Over the last two and half decades the Kuomintang and Democratic Progressive party have dominated Taiwan's party system. From 2008-2012 they were the only parties represented in the Legislative Yuan. Nevertheless, there have been periods in which other parties have had a significant impact on the party system. These parties have received considerable media attention during and between campaigns, won significant members of parliamentary and local assembly seats, and affected the Taiwanese political agenda. In this paper I assess the impact of these small parties on the party system and offer some explanations for their electoral successes and failure over the last decade.
        Export Export
3
ID:   094419


Strategies, institutions, and outcomes under SNTV in Taiwan, 1992–2004 / Patterson, Dennis P; Stockton, Hans   Journal Article
Stockton, Hans Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2010.
Summary/Abstract During the five democratic elections held in Taiwan from 1992 to 2004 inclusive, the formerly dominant Kuomintang Party (KMT) was temporarily supplanted by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) as the nation's largest political party. Most explanations for this have focused on party fragmentation and the changing patterns of electoral competition it helped create. These are important factors, but they have not been tested empirically at the level where candidates won and lost legislative seats, the level of the election district. This article offers such an empirical test, and it will show that these two factors had a direct impact on the ability of DPP and KMT candidates to obtain legislative seats. We also show that these factors carried indirect impacts by hurting the ability of the KMT and DPP to nominate in a way that they would obtain all the seats that their obtained vote shares would allow.
        Export Export