| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
008787
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May 6-13, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
055180
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
047627
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Mumbai, Charan Singh, 2000.
|
| Description |
xi, 242p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 043589 | 332.110954/RES 043589 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
019762
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July-Sept 2001.
|
| Description |
229-275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
023066
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 7, 2002.
|
| Description |
4927-4933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
022620
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 2002.
|
| Description |
91-110
|
| Summary/Abstract |
How did India achieve prominence and global competitiveness informational technologies (IT) when its record in other technology sectors has been lackluster? Conventional arguments emphasizing comparative advantage, export-led growth and the absence of state intervention, while important, have limited explanatory power. State policies, in particular, investments in higher education and public R&D institutions, a historical compromise on the English language, regulatory polices all played a role. In addition, the article emphasizes the positive network and reputational effects of the Indian diaspora (especially in Silicon Valley) to the development of the sector. It concludes by examining the broader consequences of this sector's success for India. An important direct effect is the likely emergence of India as a significant player in tradable services. However, the indirect effects such as legitimizing capitalism, spurring competition among Indian states, and giving the country a greater measure of self-confidence, may be more important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
052071
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
India's economic reform program started in 1991, unleashing a process of decentralization and competitive race among its regional states. Yet the post-reform era in India is marked by both change and continuity in terms of center-state economic relations. Attention to the path and process of reform must attend to the reform legacies of the ancien regime and how they are transformed over time. I show that the pre-reform era was characterized not by an absence of competition, but by a different type of competition among states. A historical institutional framework shows that policy change in India transforms the existing balance of power, but does so shaped by the preexisting institutional context and preexisting linkages, resources, and skills. This approach, allows us to integrate an analysis of pre-1991 policy regime into evaluations of the post-1991 changes in a more cohesive, realistic, and yet nuanced manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
012055
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May 1997.
|
| Description |
321-334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
012056
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
May 1997.
|
| Description |
321-334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
060696
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
061392
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan 2005.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The 1963 negotiations among India, the World Bank, and the Aid-India consortium represent a watershed. For the first time, members of the latter group expressed some disenchantment with what they perceived to be the slow rate of Indian economic growth caused in part, they argued, by the entrenched nature of India’s bureaucracy. This article brings out the main lines of argument among participants and attempts to evaluate the position of each. It also demonstrates the arm-twisting and coalition-building by the United States of, and with, other consortium members in order to achieve what the US believed to be the desired result, that is, increased aid to India, the world’s largest democracy and foil to the People’s Republic of China.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
007576
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Feb 11,1995.
|
| Description |
11-21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
019101
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2001.
|
| Description |
295-312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
056775
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
022979
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July-Sept 2002.
|
| Description |
372-381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
016972
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
April 16-23, 1994.
|
| Description |
Special Issues Series of articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
008843
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-March 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
023222
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Summer 2002.
|
| Description |
19-33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
015436
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
March 1993.
|
| Description |
41-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
016486
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Sept 16-30, 1993.
|
| Description |
44-56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|