Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1947Hits:19308238Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
VIRUS (4) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   108435


Evaluation of perceived threat differences posed by Filovirus v / Kuhn, Jens H; Dodd, Lori E; Wahl-Jensen, Victoria; Radoshitzky, Sheli R   Journal Article
Kuhn, Jens H Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract In the United States, filoviruses (ebolaviruses and marburgviruses) are listed as National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Category A Priority Pathogens, Select Agents, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Category A Bioterrorism Agents. In recent months, U.S. biodefense professionals and policy experts have initiated discussions on how to optimize filovirus research in regard to medical countermeasure (ie, diagnostics, antiviral, and vaccine) development. Standardized procedures and reagents could accelerate the independent verification of research results across government agencies and establish baselines for the development of animal models acceptable to regulatory entities, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), while being fiscally responsible. At the root of standardization lies the question of which filovirus strains, variants, or isolates ought to be the prototypes for product development, evaluation, and validation. Here we discuss a rationale for their selection. We conclude that, based on currently available data, filovirus biodefense research ought to focus on the classical taxonomic filovirus prototypes: Marburg virus Musoke in the case of marburgviruses and Ebola virus Mayinga in the case of Zaire ebolaviruses. Arguments have been made in various committees in favor of other variants, such as Marburg virus Angola, Ci67 or Popp, or Ebola virus Kikwit, but these rationales seem to be largely based on anecdotal or unpublished and unverified data, or they may reflect a lack of awareness of important facts about the variants' isolation history and genomic properties.
        Export Export
2
ID:   138669


Evolution of internet, cyber crimes and countermeasures / Seth, Ashok K   Article
Seth, Ashok K Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Key Words Cyber Security  Internet  Cyber Warfare  Cyber Terrorism  Hacking  Defence System 
Virus  Cyber Crimes  WWW  Cyber Espionage  Cyber Murder  Intrusion Attack 
Worm  Cyber Campaign  Bot  Cyber Sabotage 
        Export Export
3
ID:   102408


Stuxnet and the future of cyber war / Farwell, James P; Rohozinski, Rafal   Journal Article
Rohozinski, Rafal Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2011.
Summary/Abstract The discovery in June 2010 that a cyber worm dubbed 'Stuxnet' had struck the Iranian nuclear facility at Natanz suggested that, for cyber war, the future is now. Stuxnet has apparently infected over 60,000 computers, more than half of them in Iran; other countries affected include India, Indonesia, China, Azerbaijan, South Korea, Malaysia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Finland and Germany. The virus continues to spread and infect computer systems via the Internet, although its power to do damage is now limited by the availability of effective antidotes, and a built-in expiration date of 24 June 2012.
Key Words Cyber crime  Cyber War  Virus  Iranian Nuclear Program 
        Export Export
4
ID:   068251


Virus hunters / Creenfeld, Karl Taro   Journal Article
Creenfeld, Karl Taro Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Key Words China  SARS  Virus  Disease 
        Export Export