| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
069057
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
181257
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Jim Rolfe discusses New Zealand's connection with the Anglosphere security grouping.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
080911
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Despite calls over the years for the Asia-Pacific region, or some subset of it, to develop a regional security regime, no deliberate action to achieve this has been taken. This paper considers the possible ends of a regional security regime and the means towards achieving them. The ends themselves would differ according to whether any regime focused on security, traditionally and narrowly conceived, on comprehensive security or on human security. No matter which approach is taken, if the regime is to be successful in any sense beyond that of rhetoric, some of the region's cherished norms such as non-intervention as that is currently interpreted will have to be at least modified, if not completely scrapped. Even if the region collectively decides it needs a security regime and can agree on its ends, there are many alternative ways of achieving the ends and the processes of working out detailed rules will be difficult and time-consuming. None of this is to say that establishing a regional security regime will be impossible. It is to say that it will involve a lot of work, and a lot of compromise by state policy-makers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|