| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
086905
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The organisers of the lawyers' movement for the restoration and independence of the judiciary, could not have been accused of niggardliness in promising rewards to the people. From an end to police excesses and loadshedding to the elimination of corruption, unemployment and poverty, the wishlist had a cure for every major social affliction.
But as time passes, the public will discover the virtues of realism and learn to absorb the shocks of disappointment. Except for their expectations of a radical improvement in the justice system in terms that have a meaning for ordinary citizens, especially the poor and the marginalised, the other promises may well remain unfulfilled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
113513
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
128611
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
118638
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
127971
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
100202
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
122385
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
141523
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
kathmandu, Law Books Management Board, 2015.
|
| Description |
252p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058357 | 342.05095496/NEP 058357 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
113514
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
086386
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The first constitution of the independent and sovereign Republic of Kazakhstan was adopted in January 1993. Amidst heated debate in the Supreme Soviet building and heckling by a crowd of protesters outside, the Kazakh Parliament retified the country's first post-Soviet constitution in January 1993.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
159755
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Cow protection, a potent tool in the hands of cow vigilantes for atrocities against Muslims and Dalits, has become a heavily politicised issue in contemporary India. Its roots, connecting the themes of caste-Hindu religious sentiment, communalism and economic reasoning, can be traced to the late nineteenth century, though basic problems over the intriguingly complex use of cattle are clearly much older. This article relates contemporary cow protection debates specifically to Arya Samaj arguments against cow slaughter in the late nineteenth century and publication of a special issue of the journal Kalyan, titled Gau Ank, in 1945. The discussion shows how cow protection debates in the Constituent Assembly of India and in subsequent post-independence judicial verdicts were heavily influenced by these two earlier discourses. Analysing two landmark judicial decisions on cow slaughter, the article argues further that recent judicial endorsement of cow protection legitimises Hindu majoritarian sentiments in the law, while depriving millions of Indians, not just Muslims, of fundamental rights to food and livelihood. The conclusion attempts to consider some possible solutions to the current impasse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
095889
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
118551
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
126290
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
137954
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
What made democratic politicians in Central and Eastern Europe exclude themselves from governance of the judiciary? Institutional change in the judiciary is investigated through a diachronic study of the Romanian judiciary which reveals a complex causal nexus. The classical model of the ‘external incentives’ of EU accession, while explaining a general drive toward revision, played an otherwise marginal role. An institutional template prevailed, promoted by an elite transnational community of legal professionals whose entrepreneurs steering the revision of governance of the judiciary after 1989. The parliamentarians, disempowered by this revision, offered no resistance—a ‘veto-player dormancy’ that stands revealed as preconditional to such transnational influences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
145541
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2016.
|
| Description |
xlvi, 358p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9780199463794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058689 | 210.1/BER 058689 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
099541
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
118705
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
119558
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
122439
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
1. Justice Louise Arbor, the former UN Commissioner for Human Rights
in her address at the opening of 61
st
session of the Commission on
Human Rights emphasized the role of the Judiciary in the enforcement
of Human Rights. She said, "Courts the world over have been playing
an increasingly vital role in enforcing social and economic rights,
bringing them from the realms of charity to the reach of justice, linking
them and developing a body of ever-growing jurisprudence by which
we can be guided in bringing these vital rights to the reality of peoples'
lives". In order to understand the impact of international law, and in
particular, international human rights law on judicial decision-making,
one needs to look at the ways in which public international law has
affected decision-making in several jurisdictions around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|