| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
013594
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Oct 1997.
|
| Description |
961-78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
128973
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper explores the ASEAN Defense Ministers' Meeting (ADMM) and the ADMM Plus, focusing
on ASEAN's purpose to launch a meeting of defense ministers in terms of community building, the
evolution of the ADMM with the ensuing establishment of its enlarged version - the ADMM Plus, and
the significance of the ADMM Plus from a comparative perspective. A brief analysis of the approach
taken by Japan toward this multilateral framework, as a long-time dialogue partner of ASEAN, is
added to the conclusion. Generally, the ADMM and the ADMM Plus processes have so far developed
steadily, materializing in an incremental way the original visions to promote institutionalization
and practical cooperation. It is highly likely that the ADMM Plus will regularize the annual joint
exercises in nontraditional security based on the system of rotational Expert Working Groups
(EWGs). Activities in the ADMM (Plus) imply ASEAN's strong will to differentiate the framework
from the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), which countries concerned have found to be ineffective
for promoting conflict prevention and dealing with confrontational, sensitive issues of traditional
security, like the South China Sea. Today, the participants in the ADMM Plus including Japan seem
to fully recognize the utility of the platform. This is not only in terms of having a regular meeting
venue of relevant defense ministers, but also fostering deeper cooperation of defense and security by
conducting meetings at various levels of defense officials and joint exercises in nontraditional security
areas. However, the participants in the multilateral framework are going to see some future challenges
for the relevance of the mechanism, including territorial and maritime disputes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
139717
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Barry Desker, Sarah Teo Li Shan and Dylan Loh Ming Hui discuss the performance and prospects of an important ASEAN process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
103586
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Various reasons purport to explain why the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Regional Forum (ARF) has failed to evolve from confidence building to preventive diplomacy (PD). These include the ARF's large membership, its strict adherence to sovereignty and noninterference principles that contradict any effective implementation of PD, and contrasting strategic perspectives among its participants. Although these factors have certainly hindered security cooperation, none are sufficient conditions by themselves to explain the forum's ambivalence toward PD. The authors argue that these factors do not tell the whole story, not least when they have not stood in the way of experiments in PD by other processes in the Asia-Pacific. The claim here is that the ARF has evolved into a highly inflexible forum, which in turn has led to the formalization of its approach to PD. This has severely inhibited the adoption of a PD agenda and actionable measures under the ARF framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
051397
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
060616
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
061155
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 2004-05.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
102930
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
114768
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
097549
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
|
| Description |
xiii, 204p.
|
| Standard Number |
9780230229297, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 055086 | 355.031095/KAT 055086 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
018786
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2000.
|
| Description |
495-516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
006794
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis, 1996.
|
| Description |
288p.
|
| Standard Number |
8186019049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 038598 | 355.005095/SIN 038598 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
001439
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Abu Dhabi, Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research, 1998.
|
| Description |
30p.
|
| Series |
Emirates Occasional paper; no.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 040908 | 355.033059/BAL 040908 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
078100
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
013411
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
1997.
|
| Description |
480-503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
113839
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Security has undoubtedly been a central and continuous feature of ASEAN since its establishment. While it has modified its basic thinking on security and adapted elements of the attendant principles, aims and ways of operation to meet changed circumstances, the level of consistency is still readily observable. Centrality of a different sort has been evident, too, during the post-Cold War period. ASEAN has consciously sought to position itself at the heart of the developing security architecture in both East Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific. The Association has been largely successful at limiting competition and preventing inter-state conflict among its members and at fostering a stable regional order in Southeast Asia (and an incipient one outside of the boundaries of Southeast Asia). Broadly speaking, this stability has been aided and abetted by the policies of the major external powers in whose interests it has been, up until now. The extent to which a stable regional order remains in the interests of the major powers will be one of the great questions for the next phase of ASEAN's life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
047979
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
London, routledgeCurzon, 2003.
|
| Description |
xvi, 197p.
|
| Standard Number |
0415309921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 047127 | 327.170959/EMM 047127 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
159422
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article poses the question of why, after having consistently pursued an isolationist strategy of avoiding security ties with partners other than the US, and having followed the US in opposing regional security multilateralism, did Japan suddenly reverse course and get out in front of the US with its first post-war regional security initiative. This article addresses this question by tracing the internal debates, policy process and motivations that drove Japan to reverse its position, a process that transformed Japan into the leading champion of regional security multilateralism in East Asia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
106726
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The South China Sea is a growing focus of concern in Washington, at the headquarters of the US Pacific Command in Honolulu, and in a number of Southeast Asian capitals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
006698
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Japan, Defene Agency, 1996.
|
| Description |
xix, 404p.
|
| Standard Number |
4789008576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 038479 | R 355.4752/JAP 038479 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|