| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
097827
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
118224
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Prior to the election in 2010 David Cameron pledged that his first cabinet would comprise one-third women and would be the most family friendly ever. Since forming the Coalition Government, he appears to have a 'problem' with women. We argue that this problem stems from: the weak representation of women in cabinet and across government; the diminishing resources available to government actors to support gender equality policy; and women's exclusion from the key Coalition networks, both formal and informal, that determine government policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
084585
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
071227
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
113268
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Counterterrorist law is all too often made in a rushed, reactive, and repetitious way, marginalizing the deliberative, critical, and democratic functions of legislatures and leading to outcomes that later prove to be unconstitutional and counter-productive for public security. Using a political sociology approach, the article offers an analysis and theorisation of the practice of counterterrorist lawmaking. Through the UK example, the article argues that counterterrorist lawmaking compounds the existing unequal power relationships of the parliamentary field, and presents legislators with an inscrutable dilemma about the true stakes involved in legislative security politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|