Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:504Hits:20405084Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
INTERWAR IR (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   112422


Poverty of paradigms: subcultures, trading zones and the case of liberal socialism in interwar international relations / Ashworth, Lucian M   Journal Article
Ashworth, Lucian M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract In a recent article in International Affairs Duncan Bell argued that the work of Peter Galison in the history of science could be usefully applied to the study of the history of International Relations (IR). In this article I take up Bell's challenge, claiming that Galison's post-Kuhnian history of science approach can be used both to understand the history of IR and to replace the ultimately confusing notion of 'paradigm' in the study of IR theory. Galison's method of using 'microhistories' to explore the workings of 'subcultures' in science is applied to the case study of liberal socialism in interwar IR. Through this case I argue that microhistories can help us understand why certain subcultures in IR theory thrive, and others decline. This understanding in turn could help us comprehend the state of currently active subcultures in IR, and give us an alternative to the intellectually unhelpful concept of 'paradigm'.
        Export Export
2
ID:   071467


Where are the idealists in interwar international relations? / Ashworth, Lucian M   Journal Article
Ashworth, Lucian M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2006.
Summary/Abstract International Relations (IR) textbooks often make reference to an idealist paradigm in interwar IR. This article argues that an idealist paradigm did not exist, and that interwar references to idealism or utopianism are contradictory and have little to do with defining a paradigm. Not only is there no idealist paradigm in IR at this time, but authors from the interwar period that have since been dismissed as idealists rarely share the attributes assigned to idealism or utopianism by later writers. If IR scholars are serious about understanding the history of their discipline then they will have to stop applying misleading and anachronistic terms like idealism.
        Export Export