| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
167737
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The dispute between the United States and the People's Republic of China over trade and economic issues has a long history. It has now become clear, however, that Donald Trump's protectionist policy is in direct contrast to China's consistent position in defense of free trade, based on the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Washington sees in Beijing its main strategic competitor and has adopted a policy of long-term opposition to China in all spheres, including trade and economics. Having launched a trade war against China, the United States is also doing its best to weaken by noneconomic means their growing competition in the field of high technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
071583
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
164053
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article considers theoretical and practical aspects of ensuring regional security in establishing the Greater Eurasian Partnership. Since it is being created on the basis of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Chinese One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative, existing mechanisms of security in Eurasia, including the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and possibly private security and military services providers, could be used to ensure security for these projects. ... Keywords: Greater Eurasian Partnership, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, regional security, Eurasian Economic Union, Silk Road Economic Belt, private security and military services providers. Could be used to ensure security for these projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
142945
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The article examines the prospects for creating an Asia-Pacific Free Trade Area (APFTA), a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), and a Transpacific Partnership (TPP). Russia’s participation in negotiations to create a free trade zone and in integration projects in the Asia-Pacific Region is determined by its long-term geoeconomic and geopolitical interests. The latter may be considered the more relevant of the two. They are important not only for Russia’s participation in Asia-Pacific economic integration but for promoting Eurasian integration within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|