|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
158668
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
As students and scholars of global politics, we have been witnessing, participating in, and feeling the effects of recent global upheavals. These include specific events, such as the election of Trump and the vote for Brexit, but are better understood through their resulting political effects (e.g., pushing back on migration, hardening national borders, denying climate change, reneging on trade deals, gutting the welfare state, increasing resource extraction, and curtailing rights). Commentators refer to these upheavals in different ways: a rise in populism, reinvigorated nationalism, the new fascism, a polarization of Right and Left, the end of globalization, and posttruth politics. These labels have not only generated a great deal of scholarly debate, they have also helped generate multiple energies, including activism, protest, and politicization. Such developments feel at once totally unprecedented but also eerily familiar. More to the point, they have very different manifestations in different parts of the world; indeed, one of the difficulties of the present moment is the lack of analysis about the global ramifications of these upheavals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
037221
|
|
|
Publication |
Boulder, West view Press, 1984.
|
Description |
xii, 365p.
|
Series |
Studies on a just world order
|
Standard Number |
0865316783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
025233 | 327/WAL 025233 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
002895
|
|
|
Publication |
New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
|
Description |
xii, 233p.
|
Series |
Cambridge Studies in International Relations;24
|
Standard Number |
0521421195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
034360 | 327.101/WAL 034360 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
071592
|
|
|
Publication |
2006.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Recent literatures have become sceptical about the concept of an international, preferring to make claims about new forms of imperial or exceptional politics. This article examines the relation between these three concepts as conventionally understood within discourses of internationalism; expresses scepticism about the use of the term 'imperial' for capturing what is at stake in challenges to international order; and seeks to clarify what is at stake in contemporary practices of exceptionalism. Where exceptions were conventionally declared at the limits of the sovereign state, qualified by the ordering capacities of a system of sovereign states, enabled by a theory of history marking the modernity of sovereign authorities and inhibited by resistance to imperial and theological order, exceptions are now enacted in ways that exceed official cartographies of sovereign authorization. Consequently, traditions and debates about what it means to secure the modern subject that have largely reproduced options laid out by Carl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen in the 1920s and 1930s must become engaged with questions about the limits of specifically modern forms of political life. If exceptions are not being made where they are supposed to be made, subjects will not be secured where they are supposed to be secured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
024723
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Butterworths, 1987.
|
Description |
403p.
|
Standard Number |
0-408-24400-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
030331 | 303.66/MEN 030331 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|